Metamorphic P-T Paths and Zircon U-Pb Ages of Paleoproterozoic Metabasic Dykes in the Jiapigou Area, South Jilin Province: Implications for the Tectonic Evolution of the North China Craton

Ya'nan Zhao,Chunjing Wei,Xiwen Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2023.107031
IF: 3.8
2023-01-01
Precambrian Research
Abstract:The distribution and tectonic evolution of the Paleoproterozoic orogenic belts in the North China Craton (NCC) remain controversial. Especially, the extent of the Paleoproterozoic magmatic and metamorphic influences on the Archean Longgang Block needs further demonstration. This paper presents detailed petrographic and mineralogical analyses, phase equilibria modeling and zircon dating for three metabasic dyke samples in the Jiapigou area, South Jilin Province, in order to discuss their metamorphic evolution and tectonic implications. Petrographic observation and phase modeling using THERMOCALC suggest that these metabasic dykes have experienced the metamorphism with clockwise P-T paths under low-amphibolite facies, high-amphibolite facies and high-pressure granulite facies. Their peak P-T conditions were constrained to be 0.6-0.9 GPa/580-650 degrees C (JN1929), -0.95 GPa/757 degrees C (JN1918) and -1.15 GPa / 820 degrees C (JN1932), according to the stability fields of mineral assemblage and isopleths of Ti content in amphibole, anorthite component (XAn) in plagioclase, pyrope content (XPy) and grossular content (XGrs) in garnet. The peak conditions correspond to apparent geothermal gradients of 19-22celcius/km, being medium-pressure type. Zircon U-Pb dating shows that the metabasic dykes have a protolith crystallization age of 2199 +/- 5 Ma (MSWD = 0.43), and a metamorphic age of 1855 +/- 41 Ma (MSWD = 0.21). The protolith ages, metamorphic characteristics and ages of the metabasic dykes in South Jilin can be well compared with those for metabasic dykes in East Hebei and North Liaoning, indicating that the northern part of the Longgang Block was extensively affected by the mid Paleoproterozoic magmatism, and was involved in an orogen to be metamorphically reworked during the late Paleoproterozoic (1.82-1.85 Ga). In addition, this orogeny mainly occurred along the northern margin of the craton, which is different from the -1.95 Ga orogeny in the NCC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?