Implications on the Compositional Transformation of Lithospheric Mantle from Garnet Kelyphites in Mantle Peridotite Xenoliths from the Xing'an-Mongolia Orogenic Belt

Zou DongYa,Zhang HongFu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18654/1000-0569/2023.01.07
2023-01-01
Abstract:Kelyphites around garnets in mantle peridotite xenoliths are vital to understand the tectonic evolution and transformation of the mantle. Abundant coronae kelyphites around garnets were found in the garnet peridotite xenoliths hosted by the Cenozoic basalt from the Xilinhot region of the Xing'an-Mongolia Orogenic Belt (XMOB). Detail texture and mineral compositions of garnets and their kelyphites were analyzed to investigate the mantle processes beneath the XMOB. Kelyphites of garnets were classified into primitive and metasomatic types based on their different mineral assemblages. Fresh garnets were surrounded by two concentric coronae in the primitive kelyphites: the inner coronae (R1) with radial fine-grained minerals and the outer coronae (R2) with coarse-grained minerals, of which R1 is usually wider than R2. For the mineral assemblage, R1 is composed of Opx+Sp+Melt1/Pl +/- Cpx, while R2 mainly consists of Opx+Sp+Cpx. Orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene in the R1 show higher Al2O3 content and lower Mg-# value and SiO2 content than those in the R2 and peridotite xenoliths. Spinels in the R1 and R2 have similar lower Cr-# and higher Mg-# values than those in the peridotite xenoliths. Plagioclase in the R1 is anorthosite. Melts in the R1 show similar SiO2 and CaO contents and slightly higher MgO and FeO contents than those of plagioclase. The bulk compositions of R1 are consistent with that of the fresh garnets, which indicates that the R1 was produced by isochemical breakdown of garnet. In contrast, the bulk compositions of R2 show slightly higher MgO and lower SiO2 and Al2O3 contents than those in the fresh garnet, which were products of garnet-olivine reaction. The metasomatic kelyphites were formed by late metasomatism of the primitive kelyphites. Some complete metasomatic kelyphites retained the two concentric coronae textures of primitive kelyphites, while others were locally present in the primitive kelyphites. The inner corona (MR1) with fine-grained minerals and the outer corona (MR2) with coarse-grained minerals of the metasomatic kelyphites are made of Ol+Cpx+Sp+Melt2. Compared to R1 and R2, MR1 and MR2 display relatively higher Mg-# values of olivine and clinopyroxene, higher Ca/Al ratios of clinopyroxene, higher Cr-# and lower Mg-# values of spinel, and higher Na2O and K2O contents of melt. These observations indicate that the metasomatic kelyphites were formed by a reaction between primitive kelyphites and carbonate melts/fluids. Olivine and clinopyroxene grew at the expense of orthopyroxene during the reaction, as evidenced by the residual orthopyroxene in clinopyroxene of the metasomatic kelyphites. The equilibrium temperature of the R1 in individual sample is marginally higher than that of the R2. In addition, the equilibrium temperatures of R1 and R2 are higher than that of peridotite xenoliths. Therefore, we suggest that the garnet peridotites from the Xilinhot region could have experienced two stages' retrograde metamorphism at least. The first stage could be triggered by the exhumation processes from garnet-facies to spinel-facies as heated by the asthenospheric upwelling, resulting in the formation of R2 by slow reaction of garnet-olivine. The second stage was associated with consecutive decompression and heating, which led to the fast isochemical breakdown of garnet and hence produced R1. The primitive kelyphites were metasomatized by the carbonate melts/fluids in different degree after its formation and carried by the host basalt finally. Therefore, kelyphites of garnet from mantle peridotite xenoliths recorded extensive mantle upwelling, multiple exhumation and metasomatism beneath the XMOB during the Cenozoic. The North China Craton experienced strong lithospheric extension and mantle upwelling during the Late Mesozoic, which led to the decompression and heating of the lithospheric mantle. These processes also caused the transformation of garnet peridotite to spinel peridotite, which could be one of the transformation mechanisms of lithospheric mantle beneath the North China Craton.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?