A Review of Building Carbon Emission Accounting and Prediction Models

Huan Gao,Xinke Wang,Kang Wu,Yarong Zheng,Qize Wang,Wei Shi,Meng He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071617
IF: 3.324
2023-06-26
Buildings
Abstract:As an industry that consumes a quarter of social energy and emits a third of greenhouse gases, the construction industry has an important responsibility to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Based on Web of Science, Science-Direct, and CNKI, the accounting and prediction models of carbon emissions from buildings are reviewed. The carbon emission factor method, mass balance method, and actual measurement method are analyzed. The top-down and bottom-up carbon emission accounting models and their subdivision models are introduced and analyzed. Individual building carbon emission assessments generally adopt a bottom-up physical model, while urban carbon emission assessments generally adopt a top-down economic input-output model. Most of the current studies on building carbon emission prediction models follow the path of "exploring influencing factors then putting forward prediction models based on influencing factors". The studies on driving factors of carbon emission mainly use the Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) model, the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) model, the grey correlation degree model, and other models. The prediction model is realized by the regression model, the system dynamics model, and other mathematical models, as well as the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, and other machine learning models. At present, the research on carbon emission models of individual buildings mainly focuses on the prediction of operational energy consumption, and the research models for the other stages should become a focus in future research.
construction & building technology,engineering, civil
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the issues of accounting and prediction models for building carbon emissions. Specifically, the paper aims to: 1. **Systematically review existing methods for accounting building carbon emissions**: By comparing the carbon emission factor method, mass balance method, and direct measurement method, it analyzes their characteristics, applicable scopes, and limitations. Currently, the construction industry mainly uses the carbon emission factor method to calculate carbon emissions. 2. **Analyze different building carbon emission accounting models**: Including process-based methods (PB methods), economic input-output methods (EI-O methods), and hybrid methods. PB methods are suitable for micro models of individual buildings, EI-O methods are more suitable for macro models at the provincial or city level, while hybrid methods combine the advantages of both methods, improving assessment accuracy. 3. **Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of existing models and their application scenarios**: Through a literature review, it summarizes the performance of different models in practical applications and points out the strengths and weaknesses of each model. 4. **Propose future research directions**: Current research on building carbon emissions mainly focuses on energy consumption prediction during the operational phase, while research on other phases needs to be further strengthened. It is hoped that this research can provide a reference for the low-carbon transition of the construction industry and the achievement of the national goals of "carbon peaking and carbon neutrality." In summary, this review paper aims to comprehensively sort out the current state of the field of building carbon emission accounting and prediction, and provide a systematic framework for relevant researchers to guide future research work.