Development and Validation of a Novel Thoracic Spinal Stenosis Surgical Invasiveness Index: a Single-Center Study Based on 989 Patients.

Yuanyu Hu,Junbo Qi,Yanlei Dong,Hua Zhang,Qian Zhou,Jvcheng Bai,Chaoxin Wang,Zhongqiang Chen,Weishi Li,Yun Tian,Chuiguo Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.013
2023-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT:Surgical invasiveness indices have been established for general spine surgery (surgical invasiveness index [SII]), spine deformity, and metastatic spine tumors; however, a specific index for thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) has not been developed.PURPOSE:To develop and validate a novel invasiveness index, incorporating TSS-specific factors for open posterior TSS surgery, which may facilitate the prediction of operative duration and intraoperative blood loss, and the stratification of surgical risk.STUDY DESIGN:A retrospective observational study.PATIENT SAMPLE:Overall, 989 patients who underwent open posterior TSS surgeries at our institution during the past 5 years were included.OUTCOME MEASURES:The operation duration, estimated blood loss, transfusion status, major surgical complications, length of hospital stay, and medical expenses.METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the data of 989 consecutive patients who underwent posterior surgery for TSS between March 2017 and February 2022. Among them, 70% (n=692) were randomly placed in a training cohort, and the remaining 30% (n=297) automatically constituted the validation cohort. Multivariate linear regression models of operative time and log-transformed estimated blood loss were created using TSS-specific factors. Beta coefficients derived from these models were used to construct a TSS invasiveness index (TII). The ability of the TII to predict surgical invasiveness was compared with that of the SII and assessed in a validation cohort.RESULTS:The TII was more strongly correlated with operative time and estimated blood loss (p<.05) and explained more variability in operative time and estimated blood loss than the SII (p<.05). The TII explained 64.2% of operative time and 34.6% of estimated blood loss variation, whereas the SII explained 38.7% and 22.5%, respectively. In further verification, the TII was more strongly associated with transfusion rate, drainage time, and length of hospital stay than SII (p<.05).CONCLUSIONS:By incorporating TSS-specific components, the newly developed TII more accurately predicts the invasiveness of open posterior TSS surgery than the previous index.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?