Predictive value of ultrasound-guided intra-articular hip joint injection on the efficacy of arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement

SHUANG Yajuan,LAN Yu,LUO Yukun,ZHANG Mingbo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19450/j.cnki.jcrh.2023.02.009

2023-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the predictive value of ultrasound-guided intra-articular hip injection for arthroscopic surgery in patients with femoroacetabular impingement（FAI）. Methods This retrospective study collected clinical data of 89 patients with FAI who underwent arthroscopic surgery from May 2019 to May 2020. Two weeks before surgery, all patients underwent ultrasound-guided intra-articular hip joint injection. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the visual analog scale（VAS） scores of pain during hip joint examination, including internal and external rotation at 90° of hip flexion, hyperflexion, and flexion abduction external rotation（FABER） test, before and after the intra-articular hip injection. The International Hip Outcome Tool-12（iHOT-12） and Modified Harris Hip Score（MHHS） before and after surgery were compared using a paired t-test since the scores were normally distributed. According to the iHOT-12score before and after surgery, all patients were divided into the substantial clinical benefit（SCB）group and non-SCB group. Since the VAS results were not normally distributed, a nonparametric test was used to compare the two groups, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to calculate the cutoff value for predicting the surgical effect. Results 89 patients underwent intra-articular hip joint injections. The VAS scores and total scores for internal and external rotation at 90° of hip flexion, hyperflexion, and FABER test were significantly lower after the intra-articular hip injection than before（all P＜0.001）, indicating the effectiveness of the intra-articular hip injection. After hip arthroscopy, the iHOT-12 score was significantly higher in the SCB group（78.4±13.0） and the MHHS score was significantly higher in the SCB group（85.3±10.9） compared to preoperative scores（47.0±17.0） and（60.8±17.4）, respectively（t=-12.02,-10.15; all P＜0.05）.There were 68 patients in the SCB group and 21 in the non-SCB group. The VAS scores and total scores for the VAS scores and total scores for internal and external rotation at 90° of hip flexion,hyperflexion, and FABER test were significantly higher in the SCB group than in the non-SCB group（all P＜0.05）. In single-factor analysis, the VAS scores and total scores in different positions after the intra-articular hip injection were significantly higher in the SCB group than in the non-SCB group（all P＜0.05）. When the total VAS score difference before and after the intra-articular hip joint injection was ≥7.0 points under ultrasound guidance, the patient could achieve the SCB state after surgery,with a sensitivity of 60.3%（41/68）, specificity of 95.2%（20/21）, accuracy of 68.5%（61/89）, and an ROC curve area of 0.75. Conclusions The difference in VAS score before and after ultrasound-guided intra-articular hip injection can be used to predict the effect of hip joint arthroscopy in FAI patients.