Abstract:State-of-the-art industrial-level recommender system applications mostly adopt complicated model structures such as deep neural networks. While this helps with the model performance, the lack of system explainability caused by these nearly blackbox models also raises concerns and potentially weakens the users’ trust on the system. Existing work on explainable recommendation mostly focuses on designing interpretable model structures to generate model-intrinsic explanations. However, most of them have complex structures and it is difficult to directly apply these designs onto existing recommendation applications due to the effectiveness and efficiency concerns. On the other hand, while there have been some studies on explaining recommendation models without knowing their internal structures (i.e. model-agnostic explanations), these methods have been criticized for not reflecting the actual reasoning process of the recommendation model, or in other words, not faithful . How to develop model-agnostic explanation methods and evaluate them in terms of faithfulness is mostly unknown. In this work, we propose a reusable evaluation pipeline for model-agnostic explainable recommendation. Our pipeline evaluates the quality of model-agnostic explanation from the perspectives of faithfulness and scrutability. We further propose a model-agnostic explanation framework for recommendation and verify it with the proposed evaluation pipeline. Extensive experiments on public datasets demonstrate that our model-agnostic framework is able to generate explanations that are faithful to the recommendation model. We additionally provide quantitative and qualitative study to show that our explanation framework could enhance the scrutability of blackbox recommendation model. With proper modification, our evaluation pipeline and model-agnostic explanation framework could be easily migrated to existing applications. Through this work, we hope to encourage the community to focus more on faithfulness evaluation of explainable recommender systems.

Recommendation with Causality Enhanced Natural Language Explanations

Learning Post-Hoc Causal Explanations for Recommendation

Interact with the Explanations: Causal Debiased Explainable Recommendation System.

Attention Is Not the Only Choice: Counterfactual Reasoning for Path-Based Explainable Recommendation

Counterfactual Explanation for Fairness in Recommendation

Sequential Recommendation with Causal Behavior Discovery

Explainable Fairness in Recommendation

A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Explainable Recommendation

Generate Natural Language Explanations for Recommendation

CUBE: Causal Intervention-Based Counterfactual Explanation for Prediction Models

On the Relationship between Explanation and Recommendation: Learning to Rank Explanations for Improved Performance

Knowledge-grounded Natural Language Recommendation Explanation

Learning to Rank Rationales for Explainable Recommendation

Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations

Explainable Recommendation: Theory and Applications

Co-Attentive Multi-Task Learning for Explainable Recommendation.

Towards Explainable Conversational Recommendation.

Explicable recommendation model based on a time‐assisted knowledge graph and many‐objective optimization algorithm

A Reusable Model-agnostic Framework for Faithfully Explainable Recommendation and System Scrutability

Automatic Generation of Natural Language Explanations