Abstract:Central MessageWe describe TEVAR in which the stent graft was deployed into the false lumen and rescued by a fenestration procedure called the “homing technique.”See Editorial Commentary page e45. We describe TEVAR in which the stent graft was deployed into the false lumen and rescued by a fenestration procedure called the “homing technique.” See Editorial Commentary page e45. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been used increasingly as a less-invasive alternative to open surgery for patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection. However, a stent graft erroneously deployed into the false lumen may cause a rare and devastating complication. It increases the risk of early rupture and necessitates an emergency rescue procedure. We report a case that was rescued by a fenestration procedure, involving a tubular stent graft “homing technique” to draw the blood flow back into the true lumen. In addition, a large distal reentry tear was sealed with coils plus bare stents. The details are presented as follows. A 42-year-old hypertensive, nondiabetic, nonsmoker, and nonalcoholic man suddenly felt chest pain and palpitations while doing his household chores. On arrival to the emergency department, his vital signs were stable, except he had a blood pressure of 180/90 mm Hg. Electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm. Echocardiography showed evidence of Stanford type B thoracic aortic dissection. Contrast computed tomography (CT) showed Stanford type B aortic dissection with periaortic hematoma, hemorrhagic pleural effusion, and atelectatic lungs. Ultrasound-guided 10 mL drainage of blood from the effusion site confirmed the CT findings as complicated type B dissection. The main entry tear was located in the descending aorta 20 mm away from the ostium of the left subclavian artery (LSA). After management of hypertension, the patient was prepared for TEVAR. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia with full hemodynamic monitoring. Two pigtail catheters were positioned, one in the ascending aorta through the LSA and one in the ascending aorta through the right femoral artery. Aortography confirmed the CT findings. A 0.035-inch Lunderquist extra-stiff guidewire (Cook Medical Inc, Bloomington, Ind) was advanced into the ascending aorta. The stent graft (Valiant, 32/32 × 200 mm, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) was deployed, covering half of the orifice of the LSA. Repeated angiography confirmed “sealing of the false lumen” without malperfusion of the visceral vessels. However, postprocedural CT angiography, performed 1 day later, showed that the distal part of the endograft was located in the false lumen of the descending aorta (Figure 1, C and D). The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, except for mild back pain. It was thought that placing an additional stent may increase the risk of paraplegia; therefore, a rescue procedure was planned. However, this was performed 2 weeks later because of financial constraint and transfer of the patient to our center for further management. We planned to fenestrate the septum with an additional stent graft to direct the blood flow back into the true lumen. A 5F VERT catheter (Cordis Corp, Fremont, Calif) was placed into the true lumen under local anesthesia. An aortogram showed that the true lumen was compressed and had formed a blind tip at the middle of the stent graft, and that the false lumen was significantly dilated (Figure 1, A and B). Although there was no endoleak around the stent graft site, there was a large distal tear found at the junction of the abdominal aorta and celiac trunk with outflow from the false lumen into the true lumen. The proximal tip of the Lunderquist was advanced in a VERT catheter in an attempt to puncture the septum 20 mm below the previously deployed stent graft. However, several attempts to puncture the septum were unsuccessful even after using several different kinds of wires and catheters. Because prolonged procedural time under fluoroscopy may increase the risk of untoward complications, we stopped the attempts on fenestration. The third procedure was carried out 1 week later after we received an Outback LTD Re-Entry Catheter (Cordis, a Johnson & Johnson Co, Bridgewater, NJ). This is a specific intravascular device consisting of a 6F compatible catheter with an angled needle that can penetrate the intima into the true lumen, which is usually used for lower-limb artery interventions. Under local anesthesia, a 10F Fustar steerable introducing sheath (LifeTech Co, Shenzhen, China) was placed in the true lumen of the descending aorta with the tip placed 20 mm below the previously deployed stent graft. The sheath was carefully positioned with its direction to the false lumen. The Outback LTD catheter was then advanced via the Fustar introducer with its tip against the septum (Figure 2, A). The needle was advanced to puncture the septum into the false lumen, guiding a wire into the stent graft and then to the ascending aorta (Figure 1, B and C). After gradually enlarging the hole using 8 × 40-mm and 14 × 60-mm balloons (Bard Co, Karlsruhe, Germany), a 24 × 80-mm bare stent (OptiMed Co, Ettlingen, Germany) was deployed in the true lumen for remodeling. Unfortunately, in the process of retrieving the delivery sheath, the stent was unintentionally pulled down below the renal abdominal aorta. Therefore, a 26 × 80-mm bare stent (OptiMed Co) was deployed (Figure 2, D and E). A 34/30 × 160-mm stent graft (LifeTech Co) was placed from the inner previous stent graft into the bare stent via the hole in the septum (Figure 2, F). The aortography showed that the blood flow was successfully drawn back into the true lumen without endoleak and aortic branches malperfusion, except the obvious reflux from the distal tear. Considering the short distance of the distal tear to the stent graft, 4 pairs of coils (Cook Medical Inc) with a diameter of 15 mm were placed into the false lumen near the distal tear via a VERT catheter. A repeated angiogram showed normal blood flow to the aorta, the major visceral arteries, and disappearance of the false lumen. The overall procedure time was 170 minutes, and estimated blood loss was approximately 350 mL. The patient's back pain disappeared the day after the procedure. No significant complications were observed. Aortic CT angiography 1 week postprocedure showed good positioning of the stent graft, bare stents, and coils, with normal blood flow to the aorta, patent visceral artery, and vanished false lumen (Figure 3). Eighteen months postprocedure, the false lumen completely disappeared without clinical or surgical complications. Although medical management is still used in more than 60% of cases of type B aortic dissection, endovascular management (TEVAR) has increased from 7% to 31% in recent years.1Pape L.A. Awais M. Woznicki E.M. Suzuki T. Trimarchi S. Evangelista A. et al.Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: 17-year trends from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 350-358Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (585) Google Scholar However, TEVAR is acknowledged as a promising and probably preferable method for patients with complicated Stanford type B aortic dissections.2Criado F.J. Aortic dissection: a 250-year perspective.Tex Heart Inst J. 2011; 38: 694-700PubMed Google Scholar Its basic objective is to place a stent graft in the true lumen to cover the entry tear. However, a dissected and weakened vessel wall may rupture earlier after the stent graft has been unintentionally deployed into the false lumen. Previous reports of endograft deployment into the false lumen were described by Follisa and colleagues3Follisa F. Filipponea G. Stabileb A. Montalbanoa G. Florianod M. Finazzoc M. et al.Endovascular graft deployment in the false lumen of type B dissection.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010; 10: 597-599Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar and Zhang and colleagues.4Zhang R. Kofidis T. Baus S. Klima U. Iatrogenic type A dissection after attempted stenting of a descending aortic aneurysm.Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82: 1523-1525Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar In both of these studies, the guidewire was placed into the false lumen of the thoracic aorta arch during an attempt of TEVAR, similar to this case. Once the event has occurred, if the false lumen does not rupture, an emergency fenestration of the aorta distal to the endograft could reperfuse the true lumen. A second endograft should be implanted that connects the first endograft. In theory, this would be a reasonable approach but very ominous in practice because of the surgical challenge of treating the distal true lumen and visceral arteries. There are a few reports of this kind of procedure.3Follisa F. Filipponea G. Stabileb A. Montalbanoa G. Florianod M. Finazzoc M. et al.Endovascular graft deployment in the false lumen of type B dissection.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010; 10: 597-599Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar, 4Zhang R. Kofidis T. Baus S. Klima U. Iatrogenic type A dissection after attempted stenting of a descending aortic aneurysm.Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82: 1523-1525Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar, 5Watanabe Y. Kuratani T. Shirakawa Y. Torikai K. Shimamura K. Sawa Y. Hybrid endovascular repair of a dissecting thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with stent graft implantation through the false lumen.J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59: 264-267Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar As described in previous reports, surgical removal of the endoprosthesis is feasible but challenging.5Watanabe Y. Kuratani T. Shirakawa Y. Torikai K. Shimamura K. Sawa Y. Hybrid endovascular repair of a dissecting thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with stent graft implantation through the false lumen.J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59: 264-267Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar, 6Huang J.H. Liu G.Q. Wang W. Wang X.W. Stent graft implantation through the false lumen in a Stanford B aortic dissection.Chin J Vasc Surg. 2010; 2: 244-246Google Scholar A hybrid operation to maintain blood supply of the visceral arteries would be necessary before the interventional treatment but potentially traumatic. That is why we chose the fenestration technique in this case. In our case, the distal tear was so large that maintaining blood supply to the superior mesenteric artery and celiac trunk was of great concern. This gave us the opportunity to use the interventional method. Our strategy was to connect a newly placed stent graft into the previously deployed stent graft to draw the blood flow back into the true lumen, which can be called the “homing technique.” To fenestrate the aortic septum, the favorable distance to the previously placed stent graft may be 20 to 30 mm so that a long segment would be left for an additional stent graft without interfering with the blood supply to the visceral arteries. Repeated attempts on fenestration were unsuccessful because the stiff wire failed to penetrate the membrane because of the narrow true lumen; thus, we chose the Outback LTD catheter for fenestration. It is a device with an L-shaped radiopaque marker at the catheter tip indicating needle direction, especially designed to reenter the true lumen in subintimal intervention of the lower leg arteries.7Husmann M. Federer J. Keo H.H. Schmidli J. Kickuth R. Baumgartner I. et al.Bailout Revascularization of chronic femoral artery occlusions with the new Outback Catheter following failed conventional endovascular intervention.J Endovasc Ther. 2009; 16: 206-212Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar In this case, we used a steerable introducing sheath to support the device and ensure a favorable direction and puncture. Although puncture of the descending aorta for accurate location and direction is still high risk, we found that using the Outback LTD device was useful for puncturing the septum. As a general rule, a distal tear is left patent in most TEVAR procedures.8Joung B. Ko Y.G. Park S.H. Lee D.Y. Jang Y. Lim S.H. et al.Expanding false lumen in the abdominal aorta 5 years after endovascular repair of a type B aortic dissection: successful exclusion of 3 distal re-entry sites.J Endovasc Ther. 2004; 11: 577-581Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar, 9Zhao J. Sai L.K. Bin X.H. Combined use of bare stent and coils in the treatment of aortic dissection with distal tear at celiac trunk.Natl Med China. 2012; 92: 3333-3336Google Scholar However, in this case, the distal tear was very near to the stent graft and the reflux volume was large; therefore, we decided to seal the distal tear simultaneously. Because the location of the distal tear was just at the junction of the abdominal aorta and celiac trunk, necessitating a hybrid procedure, which is traumatic, we planned coil embolization as an additional procedure to TEVAR, expecting a “radical cure.”10Kölbel T. Diener H. Larena-Avellaneda A. Debus S. Advanced endovascular techniques for thoracic and abdominal aortic dissections.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2013; 54: 81-90PubMed Google Scholar Although the technique was not that difficult, we preferred to place a catheter before the bare stent that had been deployed in the aorta to prevent retro-migration of the coils.11Midulla M. Renaud A. Martinelli T. Koussa M. Mounier-Vehier C. Prat A. et al.Endovascular fenestration in aortic dissection with acute malperfusion syndrome: immediate and late follow-up.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 142: 66-72Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar The proper positioning, control, and absolute certainty of the guidewire placement in the upstream process through the true lumen are crucial to the success of the procedure. Despite the complications described earlier, TEVAR remains the therapy of choice for complicated type B aortic dissections. The technique of septum fenestration with the Outback catheter is effective and feasible by avoiding a traumatic hybrid procedure. With careful evaluation, mini-invasive interventional techniques should be applied to seal the distal tear in an attempt for “radical cure” of Stanford type B aortic dissection.

Abstract:Once the ascending aorta gets involved and however farther the dissection extends, it is named type A dissection (TAD), in which the entry tear usually locates in the ascending aorta. But there exists a small subset with primary entry tear in the descending aorta and the dissection process extends back into the ascending aorta, which here we name primary retrograde type A dissection (PRTAD). Operative procedures are far more difficult and extensive for PRTAD and usually result in poor prognosis in the aspects of surgical mortality and survival rate during follow-up.1–3 Kato et al4 and Chang et al5 showed successful method of endovascular repair for PRTAD and recommended it as an alternative to the operative treatment. During March 2008 to August 2010, five continuous patients with PRTAD were admitted into our institution. We here introduce our preliminary experience with medical therapy and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for treating PRTAD. METHODS Patient selection and demographics Inclusion criteria: (1) TAD with primary entry tear in the descending aorta; (2) no signs of cardiac tamponade or severe aortic regurgitation; (3) no signs of ischemia of the coronary artery or arch branches. Between March 2008 and August 2010, totally 359 patients of type B dissection were admitted into our institution all diagnosed by computed tomographic angiography (CTA), mostly from various hospitals throughout China. We rearranged CTA for each patient and found that seven patients were eventually TAD: one patient with the entry tear in the ascending aorta complicating by lesions of three main coronary arteries, and the remaining six patients were actually PRTAD: one patient had uncontrollable chest pain and impending aortic rupture, and was referred to Department of Cardiac Surgery for emergent surgical aortic repair. Finally, the remaining five patients all got stabilized with medical therapy initially. Detailed demographics such as patient age, gender, comorbidity and the phase of dissection were collected. Treatment strategy and stent graft placement Once vitals were stabilized, further treatment was applied, either simply medically or additionally by TEVAR. Medical therapy was composed of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or calcium antagonists administrated alone or in combination. Close observation was managed to maintain the systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mmHg. The endovascular procedure has been described in detail elsewhere.6 Important aspects potentially associated with PRTAD are highlighted as follows. Oversizing rate was between 10%-15% according to aortic diameter of proximal anchoring site (including both the true lumen and the false lumen). If the proximal landing zone, the distance from the origin of left subclavian artery (LSA) to primary entry site, was less than 15 mm, coverage of LSA was intentionally applied in order to create an extra anchoring area. Stent graft system There were three types of stent graft systems used in the study, including Hercules (Microport, China), Valiant (Medtronic, USA), and Zenith TX2 (Cook, USA), with the graft ranging from 150 to 160 mm in length and from 38 to 40 mm in diameter. Follow-up protocol and data collection All the patients were followed up by CTA at 1, 3, and 6 months and yearly thereafter after treatment. The diameter of the aorta is reported as mean±standard deviation. All the statistics of patient information and aortic diameter measurements from every CTA were collected by the author. RESULTS Patient demographics and characteristics Among the five PRTAD patients, three were male and two female, with mean age of (60±16) years (range, 36-85 years); three were in the acute phase, one in the subacute phase, and one in the chronic phase. The acute phase was defined as within 2 weeks after symptom onset, and the subacute phase was the following 2-month period; with anything thereafter called the chronic phase. Detailed patient demographics and clinical characteristics were listed in Table 1.Table 1: Patient demographics and clinical charateristicsTreatment strategy Once blood pressure got stabilized and fully considered all the patients' conditions, we continued medical therapy for patient 4 because of advanced age and malignant tumor resulting in short life expectancy and patient 5 for financial reasons. Patient 1, patient 2, and patient 3 underwent TEVAR at last (Table 1). Immediate outcomes of TEVAR Technical success was achieved in all 3 TEVAR cases. In order to acquire adequate proximal landing zone, LSA was intentionally covered in patient 2 and partially covered in patient 1, in whom proximal type I endoleak was detected on the completion angiogram and significantly resolved after a quick gentle ballooning. No procedure-related complications occurred. Follow-up outcomes All patients (patients 1-5) were followed up with an average period of (4.6±2.7) months (range, 1-11 months), and free from procedure-related complications. CTA images revealed neither edema around ascending aorta and aortic arch, nor new entry at either end of the stent graft. The false lumen was completely thrombosed in patient 1, patient 3, and patient 5, and partially thrombosed in patient 2 and patient 4. Table 2 showed the aorta diameter measurement before and after treatment in the segment of ascending aorta, aortic arch, aorta of the anchoring site, and true lumen of the descending aorta. Mean diameter before treatment was (38.4±7.4), (30.0±7.1), (33.3±2.3), and (34.0±8.1) mm, respectively. According to the latest follow-up CTA, there was slight enlargement of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and aorta of the anchoring site which reached (40.4±4.3), (33.4±3.8), and (38.0±1.7) mm, respectively; however, the true lumen of descending aorta remained relatively stable, (33.9±6.5) mm (Figure 1). The average diameter of ascending aorta, aortic arch, and the anchoring site of the TEVAR patients increased by 3.7, 5.3, and 4.7 mm respectively (Table 2). Meanwhile, mean diameter of the descending aorta decreased by 4.0 mm, which may be caused by thrombosis of the false lumen. The aorta segment of diaphragm expanded slightly by 1.3 mm. On the contrary, aorta remodeling of patients with medical therapy seemed different. The mean diameter of ascending aorta and aortic arch showed no obvious change, while that of descending aorta and segment of diaphragm expanded slightly by 3.5 and 5.5 mm, respectively.Table 2: Diameter measurement of CTA images of TEVAR and medical therapy (mm)Figure 1.: CTA images of patient 3 with TEVAR, the preoperative CTA showing the primary tear located immediately distal to LSA with thrombosed false lumen at the aortic arch and an intact ascending aorta (A, B), follow-up CTA at 3 months demostrating the complete false lumen thrombosis, the satisfactory aortic remodeling, and freedom from new-onset dissection or aneurysmal dilation (C, D).DISCUSSION In our center, PRTAD approximately stood for 1.7 % (6/358) of all the type B dissection. As far as we know, there existed controversies on its optimal treatment, and reports in this regard were rare. In this study, we discussed our acceptable preliminary experience of treating PRTAD with TEVAR and medical therapy as well. The rationale for TEVAR for PRTAD lays great emphasis on complete entry closure in the descending aorta and subsequent complete thrombosis of false lumen, which is almost similar to that for type B dissection. Kato et al4 and Chang et al5 have already showed successful experience in treating PRTAD with stent-graft placement and recommended it as an alternative to the surgical treatment. In our study, CTA images of all patients showed a predominant distal dissection in the discending aorta, with almost intact, thrombosed, and relatively small ascending aorta and aortic arch. Meanwhile, all the patients were stabilized with initial medical therapy. Given potential risks associated with the surgical aortic replacement, TEVAR was considered a reasonable alternative. TEVAR was ultimately applied to three patients. On the other hand, there were some TEVAR-specific concerns in patients with PRTAD: if such fragile and dissected proximal landing zone sustain the radial force of the stent-graft, and if the proximal fixation device of the endograft, such as bards of Zenith TX2 and the bare spring of Valiant, yields newly developed dissection or even aortic rupture. Ultimately, all three cases recovered uneventfully from TEVAR and remained free from dissection- or TEVAR-related complications during the follow-up. Compared to the usual type B dissection, PRTAD was characteristic of an unhealthy proximal landing zone, which resultantly posed the great concern of whether TEVAR would increase the risk of stent-graft-induced new entry. According to Dong et al,7 the incidence of stent-graft-induced new entry reached 3.4%, which were 22 out of 650 patients after TEVAR for type B dissection. And, the underlying causes for this complication included spring-back force from the passively curved stent graft when placed across the aortic arch potential injury of its proximal bare stent or barbs, and its radial force as well. The former two causes highly associated with the material property and design of the stent graft, which are impractical to be changed overnight. As for the radial force, however, it could be put under control via an appropriate stent graft oversizing by doctors during the pre-procedural evaluation. Therefore, in order to minimize the radial-force-induced injury, we used the diameter of the whole aorta including both the true and false lumina as the baseline for oversizing of the stent graft. Ultimately, there was no development of stent-graft-induced new entry in all TEVAR cases, suggesting the safety and feasibility of TEVAR for PRTAD. To date, medical therapy remains the first choice for uncomplicated type B dissection. Medical therapy should also be recommended for PRTAD due to its primary entry site in the descending aorta, in the setting of an intact ascending aorta with a thrombosed false lumen and no aneurysmal dilation. For the two medically treated cases in the current study, partial and complete false lumen thrombosis of the thoracic aorta were evidenced on follow-up CTA at 1 and 5 months, respectively, consistent with the fact that the simple medical treatment could also yield satisfactory outcomes. Nevertheless, CTA identified enlargement of the descending thoracic aorta in them during the follow-up, indicating relatively poorer aortic remodeling after the mere medical management. As was known, continuous aneurysmal dilation of aorta was responsible for the main stream of dissection related death due to the resultant lethal aortic rupture. Furthermore, though more than 90% of patients with uncomplicated type B dissection could luckily survive with medical therapy alone, it was unfortunately not so in terms of the three-year survival rate, which decreased to 78%, and the 5-year survival rate after firstly diagnosed was dramatically low ranging from 48% to 82%. Therefore, medical therapy alone could only be recommended in highly selected patients with serious comorbidities and short life expectancy.

Endovascular Repair of Retrograde Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection with a New Stented Graft.

Deployment of Endograft in the Ascending Aorta to Reverse Type A Aortic Dissection.

Successful Endoluminal Rescue of an Endovascular Graft Unintentionally Deployed in the False Lumen of Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection

In Vitro Stent Graft Fenestration to Preserve All Supra-aortic Branches in the Treatment of a Stanford Type A Aortic Arch Dissection

Initial Study of the Extended STABILISE Technique for Complete Remodeling in Aortic Dissection

Experience and Early Outcome of Treating Retrograde Type A Dissection with Primary Entry Tear in the Descending Thoracic Aorta.

Transluminal Stent Graft Placements for the Treatment of Standford B Type Aortic Dissection

Sandwich Technique for Endovascular Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

IP029. Fenestrated Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Physician-Modified Stent Grafts for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection with Unhealthy Proximal Landing Zone

Endovascular Repair for the Treatment of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

Anatomical Feasibility Study on Novel Ascending Aortic Endograft with More Proximal Landing Zone for Treatment of Type A Aortic Dissection

Novel Arch Fenestrated Stent Graft for Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection with Open Antegrade Implantation.

Endovascular repair techniques for the treatment of Stanford Type A aortic dissection involving ascending aorta

Surgical Repair of Two Kinds of Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Minimally Invasive Device Repair of Ascending Aortic Pathology in Selected High-risk Patients

Ascending Aorta Endovascular Repair of a Symptomatic Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer with a Custom-Made Endograft

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection with an Entry Tear in the Descending Aorta.

A Graft Inversion Technique for Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection after Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection

Endovascular Stent-graft Treatment for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

In Situ Diode Laser Fenestration of Aortic Arch Stent Grafts During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

[Current status and challenges of endovascular repair for Stanford type A aortic dissection].