Abstract:In this study, I defend the claim that we can perceptually experience what objects afford when we engage with objects belonging to natural or artificial categorical high-level kinds. Experiencing affordances perceptually positions us to act in specific ways. The main aim of this study was to argue that this view has explanatory advantages over alternative views. An increasingly popular view within the philosophy of perception, most famously defended by Susanna Siegel, claims that we sometimes visually experience natural and artificial objects as belonging to categorical high-level kinds. When visually experiencing a lemon, one does not only experience its low-level properties such as shape and color, sometimes one also experiences the object as a lemon. A challenge arises when attempting to explain what happens when one experiences an object that is experientially indistinguishable from another object, yet these objects belong to different high-level categorical kinds. For instance, if someone perceptually experiences a lemon as a lemon, her experience can be considered as accurately representing or presenting a lemon. However, if the subject perceptually experiences a lemon-shaped soap bar, which cannot be discriminated from a real lemon by sight alone, the experience is deemed inaccurate because there is no real lemon present. The problem is that such a judgment seems counterintuitive; unlike with hallucinations and illusions, there seems to be nothing wrong with how the object appears. Therefore, it is difficult to understand how the mistake could be a perceptual mistake. I will first present arguments supporting the claim that when we visually encounter objects such as lemons, we sometimes also perceive the affordances of these objects-what they provide or offer us. I will further argue that this perspective on affordances offers a more compelling explanation than other alternative accounts when it comes to our perception of visually indistinguishable objects that nonetheless belong to categorically distinct high-level kinds.

The Elicitation of Affordance Depends on Conceptual Attributes: Evidence from a Virtual Reality Study.

The Virtual Hand Illusion is Moderated by Context-Induced Spatial Reference Frames.

Disentangling the sense of agency and the sense of ownership in the virtual hand illusion paradigm

The Effect of Action Semantics, Context and Judgment Task on Object Affordance

Is there a lower visual field advantage for object affordances? A registered report

Elicitation and Evaluation of Hand-based Interaction Language for 3D Conceptual Design in Mixed Reality

Interference from multiple affordances when selecting everyday graspable objects: Thematic relations solve it.

Grasping affordance judgments depend on the object emotional value

A direct effect of perception on action when grasping a cup

Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research

Physicalizing Virtual Objects with Affordances to Support Tangible Interactions in AR

Affordance Research in Developmental Robotics: A Survey.

The Influence of Cooperative Action Intention on Object Affordance: Evidence from the Perspective-Taking Ability of Individuals

EqvAfford: SE(3) Equivariance for Point-Level Affordance Learning

Human brain dynamics dissociate early perceptual and late motor-related stages of affordance processing

Perceiving affordances and the problem of visually indiscernible kinds

Categorizing Affordances For Product Design

PartAfford: Part-level Affordance Discovery from 3D Objects

Affordance in Interaction Design Based on Unconscious and Behavior

Explicit and Implicit Measures of Body Ownership and Agency: Affected by the Same Manipulations and Yet Independent

Perceptual Dimensions of Physical Properties of Handheld Objects Induced by Impedance Changes