Quantifying Faculty Perception of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Within Academic Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Departments

Bryan Renslo,Tuleen Sawaf,Celina G. Virgen,Kevin J. Sykes,Jennifer Villwock,Alexander G. Chiu,James H. Clark
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.351
2023-01-01
otolaryngology
Abstract:ObjectiveInvestigating faculty perceptions of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) among academic otolaryngology programs. Study DesignQuantitative survey. SettingAcademic otolaryngology departments. MethodsThe DEI Inventory was developed by a multi-institutional health equity consortium and disseminated within 16 academic otolaryngology programs. The inventory consisted of 25 items graded on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree), 2 yes/no questions, and 5 items reflecting overall DEI, stress, and burnout among academic otolaryngologists. Validated imposter phenomenon and personality trait measures were also included. ResultsThe inventory received 158 (31.0%) partial and 111 (21.8%) full responses. No significant differences were identified in DEI scores by race. Compared to males, females reported lower scores on the overall DEI Inventory (3.6 vs 4.3, p < .001). Female respondents also reported greater levels of imposter phenomenon than their male counterparts (53.2 vs 47.5, p = .049). ConclusionPreliminary responses to our DEI Inventory suggest that faculty perception of DEI is not impacted by race. Female faculty report considerably lower perceptions of DEI than their male counterparts and experience greater levels of imposter phenomenon. The results of the DEI Inventory can help departments design meaningful interventions to improve levels of DEI among faculty.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?