Defining the mechanisms of action and resistance to the anti-PD-1+LAG-3 and anti-PD-1+CTLA-4 combinations in melanoma flank and brain models

Manali S. Phadke,Jiannong Li,Zhihua Chen,Paulo C. Rodriguez,J.K. Mandula,Lilit Karapetyan,Peter A. Forsyth,Y. Ann Chen,Keiran S.M. Smalley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.14.536907
IF: 12.469
2023-01-01
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Abstract:Background Although the anti-PD-1+LAG-3 and the anti-PD-1+CTLA-4 combinations are effective in advanced melanoma it remains unclear whether their mechanisms of action and resistance overlap. Methods We used single cell (sc) RNA-seq, flow cytometry and IHC analysis of responding SM1 and B16 melanoma flank tumors and SM1 brain metastases to explore the mechanism of action of the anti-PD-1+LAG-3 and the anti-PD-1+CTLA-4 combination. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell depletion and ELISPOT assays were used to demonstrate the unique role of CD4+ T cell help in the anti-tumor effects of the anti-PD-1+LAG-3 combination. Tetramer assays confirmed the loss of CD8+ tumor-reactive T cells in brain tumors resistant to the anti-PD-1+LAG-3 combination. Results The anti-PD-1+CTLA-4 combination was associated with the infiltration of FOXP3+ regulatory CD4+ cells (Tregs), fewer activated CD4+ T cells and the accumulation of a subset of IFNγ secreting cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, whereas the anti-PD-1+LAG-3 combination led to the accumulation of CD4+ T helper cells that expressed CXCR4, TNFSF8, IL21R and a subset of CD8+ T cells with reduced expression of cytotoxic markers. T cell depletion studies showed a requirement for CD4+ T cells for the anti-PD-1+LAG-3 combination, but not the PD-1-CTLA-4 combination at both flank and brain tumor sites. In anti-PD-1+LAG-3 treated tumors, CD4+ T cell depletion was associated with fewer activated (CD69+) CD8+ T cells, impaired IFNγ release and increased numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) but, conversely, increased numbers of activated CD8+ T cells and IFNγ release in anti-PD-1+CTLA-4 treated tumors. Analysis of relapsing melanoma brain metastases from anti-PD-1+LAG-3 treated mice showed an increased accumulation of MDSCs and a loss of gp100+ tumor reactive CD8+ T cells. An analysis of the inferred cell-cell interactions from the scRNA-seq data suggested the MDSCs interacted with multiple subsets of T cells in a bi-directional manner. Conclusions Together these studies suggest that these two clinically relevant ICI combinations have differential effects upon CD4+ T cell polarization, which in turn, impacted cytotoxic CD8+ T cell function. Further insights into the mechanisms of action/resistance of these clinically-relevant ICI combinations will allow therapy to be further personalized. ### Competing Interest Statement KSMS reports research funding from Revolution Medicines, unrelated to the current study. PAF serves as a Consultant to Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, BTG, GSK, Ziopharm, Tocagen, Boehringer Ingelheim, National Brain Tumor Society, Midatech Pharma, Inovio, NCCN. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?