Fitness of F1,F2 and F3 from T2A-1 transgenic rice stacked with cry2A8*/bar genes and weedy rice

LI Lei,XIAO Lequan,WANG Yuanyuan,QIANG Sheng,DAI Weimin,SONG Xiaoling
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7685/jnau.202202019
2023-01-01
Abstract:[Objectives]The paper aimed to evaluate the gene flow risks from stacked transgenic rice T2A-1 with cry2A * /bar to weed rice comprehensively. [Methods]In this experiment, F 1 +,F 2 + and F 3 +(transgene positive)hybrids(using the transgenic line T2A-1 as the paternal parent),F 1 -,F 2 -and F 3 -(transgene negative)hybrids[using the non-transgenic receptor ’Minghui 63’(MH63)as the paternal parent]with three weedy rice[Jiangsu Taizhou weedy rice(WRMM),Guangdong Maoming weedy rice(WRMM)and Hunan Yiyang weedy rice(WRYY)]accessions, were used as experimental materials. The fitness of transgene positive hybrids was evaluated in monoculture by using three kinds of weedy rice as well as transgene negative hybrids as controls. [Results]The ratios of resistant plants to non-resistant plants in the F 2 and F 3 generations were consistent with 3∶1 and 5∶1 Mendel’s segregation ratios, respectively. The target insect pressures of T2A-1,transgene positive hybrids were significantly lower than those of MH63 and transgene negative or corresponding weed rice, respectively. There were no significant differences in the composite relative fitness between the transgene positive hybrids and the corresponding transgene negative hybrids although some of fitness variables differed. The transgene positive hybrids displayed similar or significant greater composite relative fitness compared to the weedy rice counterparts. Regarding to seed shattering, the transgene positive hybrids displayed similarly with transgene negative counterparts. F 1 TZ+ and F 2 TZ+ was similar to that of the WRTZ,and the other transgene positive hybrids were lower than their weedy rice. After 120 d burial at 3 or 20 cm depth, the 27.75%-41.75% of F 2 TZ+ and F 3 TZ+ seeds were viable. [Conclusions]Under low pressure insect, although the hybrids produced from WRYY and WRMM did not display lower composite relative fitness, the seed shattering and overwintering capacity of hybrids seeds was lower than corresponding weedy rice. The hybrids seeds produced from WRTZ survived over winter, but its seed shattering was low. Meanwhile, there was no risk of fitness increase in the three generations of resistant hybrids. Therefore, the ecological risk of gene flow from T2A-1 to weedy rice was low under non-herbicide selection pressure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?