Abstract:Objective:To explore the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) system based on deep learning in evaluating bone age of children with abnormal growth and development.Methods:The positive X-ray films of the left wrist of children with abnormal growth and development who were treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 2020 to December 2021 were collected retrospectively. A total of 717 children were collected, including 266 males and 451 females, aged 2-18 (11±3) years. Based on Tanner Whitehouse 3 (TW 3)-RUS (radius, ulna, short bone) and TW3-Carpal (carpal bone) method, bone age was measured by 3 senior radiologists, and the mean value was taken as reference standard. The bone ages were independently evaluated by the AI system (Dr.Wise bone age prediction software) and two junior radiologists (physicians 1 and 2). The accuracy within 0.5 year, the accuracy within 1 year, the mean absolute error (MAE) and the root mean square error (RMSE) between the evaluation results and the reference standard were analyzed. Paired sample t-test was used to compare MAE between AI system and junior physicians. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the consistency between AI system, junior physician and reference standard. The Bland-Altman diagram was drawn and the 95% consistency limit was calculated between AI system and reference standard. Results:For TW3-RUS bone age, compared with the reference standard, the accuracy within 0.5 year of AI system, physician 1 and physician 2 was 75.3% (540/717), 62.1% (445/717) and 66.2% (475/717), respectively. The accuracy within 1 year was 96.9% (695/717), 86.3% (619/717) and 89.1% (639/717), respectively. MAE was 0.360, 0.565 and 0.496 years, and RMSE was 0.469, 0.634 and 0.572 years, respectively. For TW3-Carpal bone age, compared with the reference standard, the accuracy within 0.5 year of AI system, physician 1 and physician 2 was 80.9% (580/717), 65.1% (467/717) and 71.7% (514/717), respectively. The accuracy within 1 year was 96.0% (688/717), 87.3% (626/717) and 90.4% (648/717), respectively. MAE was 0.330, 0.527 and 0.455 years, and RMSE was 0.458, 0.612, 0.538 years, respectively. Based on TW3-RUS and TW3-Carpal bone age, the MAE of AI system were lower than those of physician 1 and physician 2, and the differences were statistically significant ( P all<0.001). The evaluation results of AI, physician 1 and physician 2 were in good agreement with the reference standard (ICC all>0.950). The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the 95% agreement limits of AI system for assessing TW3-RUS and TW3-Carpal bone age were -0.75-1.02 years and-0.86-0.91 years, respectively. Conclusion:The accuracy of AI system in evaluating the bone age of children with abnormal growth and development is close to that of senior doctors, better than that of junior doctors, and in good agreement with senior doctors.

Applicability analysis of bone age assessment standards for children in rural areas of Beijing

A comparative study of three bone age assessment methods on Chinese preschool-aged children

Validation of an Established TW3 Artificial Intelligence Bone Age Assessment System: a Prospective, Multicenter, Confirmatory Study

The analysis of variation of Han male children and adolescent bone age of wrist-hand in Beijing and Guangzhou

Model Construction for Biological Age Based on a Cross-Sectional Study of a Healthy Chinese Han Population.

Automatic Determination of the Greulich-Pyle Bone Age As an Alternative Approach for Chinese Children with Discordant Bone Age

Diagnostic Performance of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Tanner-Whitehouse 3 Bone Age Assessment System.

Validation of an AI-Powered Automated X-ray Bone Age Analyzer in Chinese Children and Adolescents: A Comparison with the Tanner-Whitehouse 3 Method

Performance of an artificial intelligence system for bone age assessment in Tibet.

Artificial Intelligence System Can Achieve Comparable Results to Experts for Bone Age Assessment of Chinese Children with Abnormal Growth and Development

Evaluation of bone age of wrist-hand in adolescent of Shenyang and Beijing

Bone age assessment based on deep neural networks with annotation-free cascaded critical bone region extraction.

[Comparison of the Accuracy for Evaluating Cervical Vertebral Bone Age and Dental Age of Children in Shanghai].

Sampling study design and radiography protocol of a large-sample investigation on skeletal maturation in 3 to 18-year-old children in China

Maturation Disparity Between Hand-Wrist Bones in a Chinese Sample of Normal Children: an Analysis Based on Automatic BoneXpert and Manual Greulich and Pyle Atlas Assessment.

Statistical Confirmation of a Method of US Determination of Bone Age

Accuracy of bone age assessment system based on deep learning in children with abnormal growth and development

Inter-rater variability and repeatability in the assessment of the Tanner-Whitehouse classification of hand radiographs for the estimation of bone age

[Assessment of Skeletal Age in Chinese Male Adolescents].

Age Trends of Bone Mineral Density and Percentile Curves in Healthy Chinese Children and Adolescents

Using Physical Examinations to Estimate Age in Elementary School Children: A Chinese Population-Based Study