Abstract:Increasing evidence suggests that state policies impact constituents' health, but political determinants of health and health inequities remain understudied. Using state and year fixed-effects models, we determined the extent to which changes in electoral partisan bias in lower chambers of U.S. state legislatures (i.e., discrepancy between statewide vote share and seat share) were followed by changes in five state policies affecting children and families (1980-2019) and a composite of safety net programs (1999-2018). We examined effects on each policy and whether the effect was modified when bias was accompanied by unified party control. Next, we determined whether the effect differed depending on which party it favored. Less bias resulted only in higher AFDC/TANF benefits. Both pro-Democratic and pro-Republican bias was followed by decreased AFDC/TANF benefits and increased Medicaid benefits. AFDC/TANF recipients, unemployment benefits, minimum wage, and pre-K-12 education spending increased following pro-Democratic bias and decreased following pro-Republican bias. Estimated effects on the composite measure of safety net policies were all close to null. Some effects were modulated by unified party control. Results demonstrate that increasing fairness in elections is not a panacea by itself for increasing generosity of programs affecting children's well-being. Indeed, bias can be somewhat beneficial for the expansiveness of some policies. Furthermore, with the exception of unemployment benefits and AFDC/TANF recipients, Democrats have not been using the additional power that comes with electoral bias to spend more on major programs that benefit children. Finally, after decades in which electoral bias was in Democrats' favor, bias has started to shift toward Republicans in the last decade. This trend forecasts more cuts in almost all the policies in this study, especially education and AFDC/TANF recipients. There is a need for more research and advocacy emphasis on the political determinants of social determinants of health, especially at the state level.

Changes to JCE's Board of Associate Editors

Does Proportionality Increase Turnout? A Study of Adaptation to Oscillating Electoral Systems

Pork barrel politics, voter turnout, and inequality: An experimental study

Assessing differences in legislators' revealed preferences: A case study on the 107th U.S. Senate

Random Votes to Parties and Policies in Coalition Governments

The causal effect of political power on the provision of public education: Evidence from a weighted voting system

The Npc System and Its Evolution: from Nomenklatura to Selectorate

Preference vote and intra-party competition in open list PR systems

Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?

The drastic outcomes from voting alliances in three-party bottom-up democratic voting (1990 $\rightarrow$ 2013)

Building Parties’ Grassroots: Electoral Systems, Party Organizations, and Social Linkages from a Cross-National Perspective

Optimizing Districting and Seat Allocation for Enhanced Representativeness in Chile's Chamber of Deputies

Is fair representation good for children? effects of electoral partisan bias in state legislatures on policies affecting children's health and well-being

New fairness criteria for truncated ballots in multi-winner ranked-choice elections

Between plurality and proportionality: an analysis of vote transfer systems

Candidate Incentive Distributions: How voting methods shape electoral incentives

Effects of electoral margins on party loyalty in the roll call votes: Evidence from the 20th National Assembly in South Korea

Electoral Dividends from Programmatic Policies: A Theoretical Proposal Based on the Brazilian Case

Redistricting Reforms Reduce Gerrymandering by Constraining Partisan Actors

Universality in voting behavior: an empirical analysis

Multi-level legislative representation in an inchoate party system: Mass-elite ideological congruence in Brazil