Abstract:Abstract Background In vivo corneal biomechanics evaluation has been used to help screen early keratoconus in recent years. This study is to evaluate the value of a Scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser combined with tomography in detecting subclinical keratoconus by distinguishing normal eyes from frank keratoconus (KC) and forme frusta keratoconus (FFKC) eyes in Chinese patients. Methods Study design: diagnostic test. This study included 31 bilateral frank keratoconus patients, 27 unilateral clinically manifesting keratoconus patients with very asymmetric eyes, and 79 control subjects with normal corneas. Corneal morphological and biomechanical parameters were measured using a Pentacam HR and a Corvis ST (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany). The diagnostic ability of computed parameters reflecting corneal biomechanical and morphological traits [including the Belin-Ambrósio deviation index (BAD_D), the Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) and the tomographic and biomechanical index (TBI)] was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared by the DeLong test. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC), the best cut-off values, and the Youden index for each parameter were reported. A novel corneal stiffness parameter, the stress-strain index (SSI), was also compared between KC, FFKC and normal eyes. Results Every morphological and biomechanical index analysed in this study was significantly different among KC, FFKC and normal eyes (P = 0.000). The TBI was most valuable in detecting subclinical keratoconus (FFKC eyes), with an AUC of 0.928 (P = 0.000), and both forms of corneal ectasia (FFKC and frank KC eyes), with an AUC of 0.966 (P = 0.000). The sensitivity and specificity of the TBI was 97.5 and 77.8 % in detecting FFKC and 97.5 and 89.7 % in detecting any KC, respectively, with a cut-off value of 0.375. The morphological index BAD_D and the biomechanical index CBI were also very useful in distinguishing eyes with any KC from normal eyes, with AUCs of 0.965 and 0.934, respectively. The SSI was significantly different between KC, FFKC and normal eyes (P = 0.000), indicating an independent decrease in corneal stiffness in KC eyes. Conclusions The combination of a Scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography could increase the accuracy in detecting subclinical keratoconus in Chinese patients. The TBI was the most valuable index for detecting subclinical keratoconus, with a high sensitivity and specificity. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in refractive surgery candidates could be helpful for recognizing potential keratoconic eyes and increasing surgical safety.

Detection of Keratoconus With a New Corvis Biomechanical Index Optimized for Chinese Populations

Application of a Scheimpflug-Based Biomechanical Analyser and Tomography in the Early Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus in Chinese Patients

Clinical Features of 233 Cases of Keratoconus

The application of corneal biomechanical interocular asymmetry for the diagnosis of keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus

Research of diagnostic value of corneal biomechanical parameters based on Corvis ST in keratoconus

Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes

A Potential Screening Index of Corneal Biomechanics in Healthy Subjects, Forme Fruste Keratoconus Patients and Clinical Keratoconus Patients

Comparison of bilateral differential characteristics of corneal biomechanics between keratoconus and normal eyes

Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects

The Role of Pentacam Random Forest Index in Detecting Subclinical Keratoconus in a Chinese Cohort

Keratoconus Recognition Using A Parameter Set Determined from IOP-Matched Scenario

Comparative study of the corneal morphological characteristics of keratoconus evaluated using CASIA2, Sirius, and Pentacam

Performance of Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes

Comparison of a Scheimpflug imaging with other screening indices in diagnosing keratoconus and keratoconus suspect

Corneal biomechanical metrics of healthy Chinese adults using Corvis ST.

Evaluation of new Corvis ST parameters in normal, Post-LASIK, Post-LASIK keratectasia and keratoconus eyes

Longitudinal Evaluation of Biomechanical Indices in Fellow Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus Classified as Having Very Asymmetric Ectasia With Normal Topography

Improving early detection of keratoconus by Non Contact Tonometry. A computational study and new biomarkers proposal

Examination and discriminant analysis of corneal biomechanics with CorVis ST in keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus

Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics Using Brillouin Microscopy in Chinese Adults With Myopia

Assessment of the specificity of corvis biomechanical index-laser vision correction (CBI-LVC) in stable corneas after phototherapeutic keratectomy