Abstract:Point, line and/or planar defects are ubiquitously present in all materials and intentional introduction and control of defects plays a key role in the development of advanced materials with better performance and new functionality. Well-known examples include doping semiconductors to modify the band structure and using phase or grain boundaries to strengthen alloys. Like other materials, battery intercalation compounds contain various types of defects, and “defect engineering” is a promising strategy for this class of materials, which nonetheless has not yet been widely explored. In particular, recent studies find that antisite defects in battery compounds, can promote Li transport by opening up alternative diffusion channels with lower migration energies in numerous lithium-ion battery electrode materials, which enhances the rate performance of batteries. Antisite defects are also reported to improve the stability and cyclability of cubic LixTi2O4. These examples demonstrate that the rational tailoring of antisite defects provides a potentially general approach to improving battery electrode properties. Here we present a computational study that reveals a new mechanism of antisite defects enhancing the rate capability of intercalation compounds by accelerating surface-reaction-limited (SRL) phase transformation during battery charge/discharge. Antisite defects are generated when the sites of intercalating ions are occupied by other cations that are usually less mobile. A prominent effect of antisite defects in battery electrodes is to block the existing paths of intercalating ions and generate new migration pathways at the same time. For intercalation compounds with strong anisotropic transport properties, such effect usually leads to the reduction in the diffusion anisotropy of intercalating ions, which has already been observed in practically synthesized lithium iron phosphate olivine (LiFePO4). In this work, we discovered that although antisite defects in LiFePO4 impede Li movement in the fast [010] diffusion direction, their ability to enhance transport along other slower diffusion directions leads to an unexpected increase in the phase transition rate when it is kinetically limited by surface reaction. Figure 1. compares the discharge simulations of two LiFePO4 particles with different antisite defect concentrations. Orders-of-magnitude improvement in SRL phase transformation kinetics is observed in “defect-rich” particle due to the increase of active surface area for Li intercalation. More transparent understanding of such mechanism was obtained by solving 1D depth-average model numerically and analytically. Meanwhile, it is revealed that the presence of defects causes Li intercalation time to increase less pronouncedly with particle sizes, and can reduce the risk of electrochemical shock under galvanostatic (dis)charge conditions by homogenizing the reaction flux. Due to the kinetic competition between surface reaction and bulk diffusion, an optimal defect concentration is predicted to exist for a given particle geometry to maximize the Li (de)intercalation rate. Criteria for the co-design of defect content and particle morphology are proposed. Counter-intuitively, we find that (100)-oriented LiFePO4 platelike particles may exhibit even better rate performance than (010)-oriented plate particles in the SRL kinetic regime, which are commonly viewed as the most desirable LiFePO4 particle morphology. While we demonstrate the possibility of using antisite defects to accelerate phase transitions in LiFePO4, it has general applicability to other phase-changing battery materials that exhibit ion diffusion anisotropy. Figure 1

The Influence of Step Potentials Upon Defect Equilibria and Defect Concentrations Inside Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Lattice Boltzmann Modelling of the Coupling Between Charge Transport and Electrochemical Reactions in a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell with a Patterned Anode

Defect-Enhanced Phase Transformation Kinetics in Intercalation Compounds

Defect Engineering for Fuel‐Cell Electrocatalysts

From Fundamental Interfacial Reaction Kinetics to Macroscopic Current–Voltage Characteristics: Case Study of Solid Acid Fuel Cell Limitations and Possibilities

Modeling of cooperative defect transport and thermal mismatch in a planar solid oxide fuel cell

Overpotentials at kinetic bottlenecks cause inordinate internal phase formation in electrochemical cells

Influence of Operating Conditions on the Fuel Electrode Degradation of Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell Investigated by Phase Field Model with Wettability Analysis

Physical principles for the calculation of equilibrium potential for co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide in a Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Cell (SOEC)

Electrochemical performance study of solid oxide fuel cell using lattice Boltzmann method

Percolation theory to predict effective properties of solid oxide fuel-cell composite electrodes

Numerical Simulation of the Residual Stress and Failure Probability of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Nonplanar Cathode–electrolyte Interfaces

Three-dimensional multiphysics coupling numerical simulation of a proton conductor solid oxide fuel cell based on multi-defect transport.

Multifactor theoretical analysis of current leakage in proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells

Residual Stress Analysis of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Functional Gradient Material Electrodes

Effect of the Electrochemical Active Site on Thermal Stress in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Revealing and quantifying the role of oxygen-ionic current in proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: A modeling study

A General Mechanistic Model of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Heterogeneous electrocatalysis in porous cathodes of solid oxide fuel cells

An Analytical Model for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Bi-Layer Electrolyte

Numerical Simulation of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Comparing Different Electrochemical Kinetics