Comparison of the Incidence Rate of Radiation Pneumonitis Observed in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Treated with Simultaneous Thoracic Radiotherapy and 1G/2G/3G EGFR-TKIs

Fengchun Mu,Bingjie Fan,Butuo Li,Wenru Qin,Haoqian Li,Chunni Wang,Bing Zou,Shijiang Wang,Linlin Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S404874
2023-01-01
Cancer Management and Research
Abstract:Purpose: The present study aimed to evaluate the incidence rate of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated with first-generation (1G), second-generation (2G), or third-generation (3G) epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) combined with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma simultaneously treated with 1G/2G/3G EGFR-TKIs and TRT between 2015-2021 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were screened. The incidence rate of clinical and imaging RP was compared between the three groups. Results: A total of 200 patients treated with EGFR-TKIs were enrolled in this study, including 100 patients who were treated with 1G EGFR-TKIs, 50 patients who were treated with 2G EGFR-TKIs, and 50 patients who were treated with 3G EGFR-TKIs (patients matched in a 2:1:1 ratio for tumor characteristics). The overall incidence of clinical RP in the 1G, 2G, and 3G EGFR-TKI groups were 29%, 48%, and 28% (p=0.043), respectively, and that of imaging RP were 33%, 58%, and 36% (p=0.010), respectively. The incidence of RP with a clinical grade >3 in the three groups were 14%, 28%, and 12% (p=0.055), respectively, and that with an imaging grade >3 in the three groups were 11%, 32%, and 10% (p=0.002), respectively. The incidence of clinical RP was higher in the CFRT group than in the SBRT group, with an overall clinical grade of 38% vs 10% (p<0.001) and imaging grade of 46% vs 10% (p<0.001), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, only GTV volume was an independent predictive factor for all risks of clinical and imaging RP. V20 and grouping of 1G/2G/3G EGFR-TKIs were other independent predictive factors for the risk factors of RP for imaging grades. Conclusion: Compared with 2G EGFR-TKIs combined with TRT, 1G or 3G EGFR-TKIs combined with TRT achieved a lower incidence of RP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?