Abstract:Learning to rank, which learns the ranking function from training data, has become an emerging research area in information retrieval and machine learning. Most existing work on learning to rank assumes that the training data is clean, which is not always true, however. The ambiguity of query intent, the lack of domain knowledge, and the vague definition of relevance levels all make it difficult for common annotators to give reliable relevance labels to some documents. As a result, the relevance labels in the training data of learning to rank usually contain noise. If we ignore this fact, the performance of learning-to-rank algorithms will be damaged. In this article, we propose considering the labeling noise in the process of learning to rank and using a two-step approach to extend existing algorithms to handle noisy training data. In the first step, we estimate the degree of labeling noise for a training document. To this end, we assume that the majority of the relevance labels in the training data are reliable and we use a graphical model to describe the generative process of a training query, the feature vectors of its associated documents, and the relevance labels of these documents. The parameters in the graphical model are learned by means of maximum likelihood estimation. Then the conditional probability of the relevance label given the feature vector of a document is computed. If the probability is large, we regard the degree of labeling noise for this document as small; otherwise, we regard the degree as large. In the second step, we extend existing learning-to-rank algorithms by incorporating the estimated degree of labeling noise into their loss functions. Specifically, we give larger weights to those training documents with smaller degrees of labeling noise and smaller weights to those with larger degrees of labeling noise. As examples, we demonstrate the extensions for McRank, RankSVM, RankBoost, and RankNet. Empirical results on benchmark datasets show that the proposed approach can effectively distinguish noisy documents from clean ones, and the extended learning-to-rank algorithms can achieve better performances than baselines.

Learning Top-k Classification with Label Ranking

Top-k learning to rank: labeling, ranking and evaluation.

Instance-Ranking: A New Perspective to Consider the Instance Dependency for Classification

Top-K Pairwise Ranking: Bridging the Gap Among Ranking-Based Measures for Multi-Label Classification

RW.KNN: a proposed random walk KNN algorithm for multi-label classification.

Label Distribution Learning-Enhanced Dual-KNN for Text Classification

A Bayesian Network nearest k-labels method for Multi-label classification

Is Top-K Sufficient for Ranking?

Top-$k$ Classification and Cardinality-Aware Prediction

A Multiclass Classification Approach to Label Ranking

Joint Ranking SVM and Binary Relevance with Robust Low-Rank Learning for Multi-Label Classification

Statistical Consistency of Top-k Ranking.

A Taxonomy of Label Ranking Algorithms.

Learning to Rank from Noisy Data

Unbiased Top-k Learning to Rank with Causal Likelihood Decomposition

Online Multi-Label Classification under Noisy and Changing Label Distribution

A K-Nearest Neighbor Based Algorithm for Multi-Label Classification.

Cardinality-Aware Set Prediction and Top-$k$ Classification

Stochastic Top-k ListNet

Deep Top- $k$ Ranking for Image–Sentence Matching

A ranking-based problem transformation method for weakly supervised multi-label learning