Abstract:Treatment effect plays an important role on decision making in many fields, such as social marketing, healthcare, and public policy. The key challenge on estimating treatment effect in the wild observational studies is to handle confounding bias induced by imbalance of the confounder distributions between treated and control units. Traditional methods remove confounding bias by re-weighting units with supposedly accurate propensity score estimation under the unconfoundedness assumption. Controlling high-dimensional variables may make the unconfoundedness assumption more plausible, but poses new challenge on accurate propensity score estimation. One strand of recent literature seeks to directly optimize weights to balance confounder distributions, bypassing propensity score estimation. But existing balancing methods fail to do selection and differentiation among the pool of a large number of potential confounders, leading to possible underperformance in many high-dimensional settings. In this article, we propose a data-driven Differentiated Confounder Balancing (DCB) algorithm to jointly select confounders, differentiate weights of confounders and balance confounder distributions for treatment effect estimation in the wild high-dimensional settings. Besides, under some settings with heavy confounding bias, in order to further reduce the bias and variance of estimated treatment effect, we propose a Regression Adjusted Differentiated Confounder Balancing (RA-DCB) algorithm based on our DCB algorithm by incorporating outcome regression adjustment. The synergistic learning algorithms we proposed are more capable of reducing the confounding bias in many observational studies. To validate the effectiveness of our DCB and RA-DCB algorithms, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that our algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art methods. By incorporating regression adjustment, our RA-DCB algorithm achieves more precise estimation on treatment effect than DCB algorithm, especially under the settings with heavy confounding bias. Moreover, we show that the top features ranked by our algorithm generate accurate prediction of online advertising effect.

Treatment Effect Estimation with Collider Bias and Confounding Bias

Learning Shadow Variable Representation for Treatment Effect Estimation under Collider Bias

A Generative Approach for Treatment Effect Estimation under Collider Bias: from an Out-of-Distribution Perspective

Treatment Effect Estimation Via Differentiated Confounder Balancing and Regression

Estimating Treatment Effect in the Wild via Differentiated Confounder Balancing

An Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Method that Accounts for Right-censoring for Causal Inference with Multiple Treatments and a Binary Outcome

Post-Treatment Confounding in Causal Mediation Studies: A Cutting-Edge Problem and A Novel Solution via Sensitivity Analysis

The Blessings of Multiple Treatments and Outcomes in Treatment Effect Estimation

Debiased Causal Tree: Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation with Unmeasured Confounding

A flexible approach for causal inference with multiple treatments and clustered survival outcomes

A Unified Framework for Efficient Estimation of General Treatment Models

RCT Rejection Sampling for Causal Estimation Evaluation

Causal Mediation Analysis with Hidden Confounders

Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects

Optimal Transport for Treatment Effect Estimation

The Magnitude and Direction of Collider Bias for Binary Variables

Doubly Robust Proximal Causal Inference under Confounded Outcome-Dependent Sampling

Theory for identification and Inference with Synthetic Controls: A Proximal Causal Inference Framework

Learning Decomposed Representations for Treatment Effect Estimation

Identification of Causal Effects with Latent Confounding and Classical Additive Errors in Treatment

Differentiated Matching for Individual and Average Treatment Effect Estimation