Abstract:Model validation is the most important part of building a supervised model. For building a model with good generalization performance one must have a sensible data splitting strategy, and this is crucial for model validation. In this study, we conducted a comparative study on various reported data splitting methods. The MixSim model was employed to generate nine simulated datasets with different probabilities of mis-classification and variable sample sizes. Then partial least squares for discriminant analysis and support vector machines for classification were applied to these datasets. Data splitting methods tested included variants of cross-validation, bootstrapping, bootstrapped Latin partition, Kennard-Stone algorithm (K-S) and sample set partitioning based on joint X–Y distances algorithm (SPXY). These methods were employed to split the data into training and validation sets. The estimated generalization performances from the validation sets were then compared with the ones obtained from the blind test sets which were generated from the same distribution but were unseen by the training/validation procedure used in model construction. The results showed that the size of the data is the deciding factor for the qualities of the generalization performance estimated from the validation set. We found that there was a significant gap between the performance estimated from the validation set and the one from the test set for the all the data splitting methods employed on small datasets. Such disparity decreased when more samples were available for training/validation, and this is because the models were then moving towards approximations of the central limit theory for the simulated datasets used. We also found that having too many or too few samples in the training set had a negative effect on the estimated model performance, suggesting that it is necessary to have a good balance between the sizes of training set and validation set to have a reliable estimation of model performance. We also found that systematic sampling method such as K-S and SPXY generally had very poor estimation of the model performance, most likely due to the fact that they are designed to take the most representative samples first and thus left a rather poorly representative sample set for model performance estimation.

Proximal Validation Protocol

Perturbation Validation: A New Heuristic to Validate Machine Learning Models

External validation of machine learning models - registered models and adaptive sample splitting

Clinical Prediction Models: Model Validation

Managing dataset shift by adversarial validation for credit scoring

All models are local: time to replace external validation with recurrent local validation

Proximal boosting: aggregating weak learners to minimize non-differentiable losses

Train on Validation: Squeezing the Data Lemon

TransNeural: An Enhanced-Transformer-Based Performance Pre-Validation Model for Split Learning Tasks

RESAMPLING METHODS FOR A RELIABLE VALIDATION SET IN DEEP LEARNING BASED POINT CLOUD CLASSIFICATION

A critical look at the current train/test split in machine learning

Asynchronous Stochastic Proximal Optimization Algorithms with Variance Reduction

On Splitting Training and Validation Set: A Comparative Study of Cross-Validation, Bootstrap and Systematic Sampling for Estimating the Generalization Performance of Supervised Learning

Programming Every Example: Lifting Pre-training Data Quality like Experts at Scale

Efficient Meta Learning Via Minibatch Proximal Update

A roadmap to fair and trustworthy prediction model validation in healthcare

Progressive Multi-modal Conditional Prompt Tuning

Robust Validation: Confident Predictions Even When Distributions Shift

PRDP: Proximal Reward Difference Prediction for Large-Scale Reward Finetuning of Diffusion Models

Prototypical Fine-Tuning: Towards Robust Performance under Varying Data Sizes

Multi-task proximal support vector machine