The Prognostic Nomogram for PSA-incongruent Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy

Yan Wang,Yinjie Zhu,Liancheng Fan,Jiazhou Liu,Jiahua Pan,Wei Xue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03560-x
IF: 2.2662
2023-01-01
International Urology and Nephrology
Abstract:To establish a prognostic nomogram for PSA-incongruent low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients (Gleason score 6 and clinical stage T2a) at diagnosis and treated with radical prostatectomy (RP), based on clinical and pathological metrics. In total, 217 patients diagnosed with PCa were included in this study. All patients had a Gleason score of 6 (GS6) in biopsy, had clinical T2a before surgery and were treated with RP. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine prognostic factors related to bPFS. A prognostic nomogram was established based on factors that were significant in the multivariate analyses. The median bPFS had a significant difference in the subgroup of PSA at diagnosis (‘ < 10 ng/mL’: 71.698 [67.549–75.847] vs ‘10–20 ng/mL’: 71.038 [66.220–75.857] vs ‘ ≥ 20 ng/mL’: 26.746 [12.384–41.108] months [Log Rank P < 0.001]), the subgroup of T stage upgrade (Negative: 70.016 [65.846–74.187] vs ‘T2b/c’: 69.183 [63.544–74.822] vs ‘T3/4’: 32.235 [11.877–52.593] months [Log Rank P < 0.001]) and the subgroup of Gleason score upgrade (Negative: 72.63 [69.096–76.163] vs ‘3 + 4’: 68.393 [62.243–74.543] vs ‘4 + 3’: 41.427 [27.517–55.336] vs ‘ ≥ 8’: 28.291 [7.527–49.055] [Log Rank P < 0.001]). PSA at diagnoses (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.027, 95% CI 1.015–1.039, P < 0.001), T stage upgrade (HR 2.116, 95% CI 1.083–4.133, P = 0.028), and Gleason score upgrade (HR 2.831, 95% CI 1.892–4.237, P < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors with significance in multivariable Cox regression analysis. A nomogram was established based on these three factors. Our study indicated that PSA-incongruent low-risk PCa patients (PSA with 10–20 ng/mL) had a similar prognosis to those with real low-risk PCa (PSA < 10 ng/mL) in the D’ Amico criteria. We also established a nomogram based on three significant prognostic factors, including PSA at diagnosis, T stage upgrade, and Gleason score upgrade, which were associated with clinical outcomes in prostate cancer patients with GS6 and T2a after surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?