Determining the Harvest Frequency to Maintain Grassland Productivity and Minimum Nutrient Removal from Soil

Yang Zheng,Jiu-Ying Pei,Chao Fang,Josep Peñuelas,Jordi Sardans,You-Cai Xiong,Dan-Feng Li,Wen-Bin Ke,Jian-Sheng Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05907-w
IF: 4.993
2023-01-01
Plant and Soil
Abstract:Quantifying grassland aboveground biomass and soil nutrient removal in response to harvest intensities is essential to balance productivity and conservation benefit. There is a lack of studies examining the harvest frequency-induced threshold that leads to abrupt decay in grassland functioning. Based on field experiments in a semiarid and a dry subhumid grassland, we tested threshold responses of aboveground biomass (AGB) and removed plant nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) to 9-harvest frequency gradients within-year (2017 and 2018); and the legacy effects of harvest on AGB and soil available N and P pools and stoichiometry following cessation (2019) of harvest. In both grasslands, the plant AGB within-year were highest at the frequency of 2-harvest; it abruptly decreased once the threshold was exceeded. Moreover, except for plant N at the semiarid site, the response patterns of the N and P removals to harvest frequency were similar to that of plant AGB. The increased removal of N was higher than P with harvest frequency, leading to decreased soil available N/P ratio excess of twice at the dry subhumid site. Following cessation, the previous harvest frequency had a negative legacy effect on both plant AGB and the ratio of graminoid to forb species. These results indicate that ≤2-harvest annually are applicable for optimal pastoral production; among which one harvest by the end of the growing season may be appropriate for conserving above- and below-ground parts and maintaining healthy grassland functions. Soil N/P condition should be considered as an indicator when determining a sustainable harvest frequency.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?