Do Full Mechanized Management Strategies Destroy Soil Health and Fertility in Sugarcane Fields?

Jian Xiao,Tian Liang,Shangdong Yang,Hongwei Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107000
IF: 6.367
2023-01-01
CATENA
Abstract:To provide new insights into whether soil health and fertility in realistic sugarcane production are destroyed by full mechanized cultivation (FMC), we investigated the differential structures and functions of soil bacterial and fungal communities by FMC and conventional artificial cultivation (CAC) treatments in sugarcane fields. The results showed that the soil water, total phosphorus, available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents significantly increased, but soil bulk density and pH significantly decreased in the FMC treatment compared with the CAC treatment. The activities of soil enzymes such as beta-glucosidase, aminopeptidase, and acid phosphatase changed irregularly. Compared with the CAC treatment, significantly higher beta-glucosidase activity and significantly lower aminopeptidase and acid phosphatase activities were detected in the FMC treatment. The soil microbial biomass carbon and microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP) increased; in particular, significant increases in MBP were observed in the FMC treatment. In contrast, soil microbial biomass nitrogen significantly decreased in the FMC treatment. In addition, mechanized cultivation altered soil microbial community structures and their metabolite profiles in sugarcane fields. Although soil bacterial diversity and abundance were significantly reduced, fungal abundance was not significantly different in the FMC treatment. Moreover, compared with CAC treatments, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidothermus, Chujaibacter, Conexibacter, and Longimycelium, were significantly enriched in the FMC treatments. In addition, fungal community composition, only Gymnopilus at the genus level was significantly enriched in the FMC treatment. Eight differential metabolites were detected in soils of sugarcane fields between the FMC and CAC treatments and were also found in background (BG) soil. Among them, only organic acids and sugars were positively or negatively correlated with the abundance of different bacteria. Starch and sucrose metabolism were the most differentially expressed metabolic pathways between the FMC and CAC treatments. These results suggest that FMC did not destroy soil health and fertility in sugarcane fields.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?