Differences Between Ante Mortem Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers in Predicting Neuropathology at Autopsy.

Zhi-Bo Wang,Lan Tan,Hui-Fu Wang,Shi-Dong Chen,Yan Fu,Pei-Yang Gao,Ya-Hui Ma,Yu Guo,Jia-Hui Hou,Dan-Dan Zhang,Jin-Tai Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12997
2023-01-01
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Abstract:INTRODUCTION:This study aimed to assess whether biomarkers related to amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration can accurately predict Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology at autopsy in early and late clinical stages.METHODS:We included 100 participants who had ante mortem biomarker measurements and underwent post mortem neuropathological examination. Based on ante mortem clinical diagnosis, participants were divided into non-dementia and dementia, as early or late clinical stages.RESULTS:Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta (Aβ)42/phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181 showed excellent performance in differentiating autopsy-confirmed AD and predicting the risk of neuropathological changes in early and late clinical stages. However, CSF Aβ42 performed better in the early clinical stage, while CSF p-tau181, CSF t-tau, and plasma p-tau181 performed better in the late clinical stage.DISCUSSION:Our findings provide important clinical information that, if using PET, CSF, and plasma biomarkers to detect AD pathology, researchers must consider their differential performances at different clinical stages of AD.HIGHLIGHTS:Amyloid PET and CSF Aβ42/p-tau181 were the most promising candidate biomarkers for predicting AD pathology. CSF Aβ42 can serve as a candidate predictive biomarker in the early clinical stage of AD. CSF p-tau181, CSF t-tau, and plasma p-tau181 can serve as candidate predictive biomarkers in the late clinical stage of AD. Combining APOE ε4 genotypes can significantly improve the predictive accuracy of AD-related biomarkers for AD pathology.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?