Abstract:In the energy sector, energy provider, electrical grids, microenergy grids, and shared energy storage service providers are typically owned by distinct stakeholders. Their individual quests for maximizing profits can readily incite unregulated competition. To counter this issue, our research introduces a sophisticated bilevel coordinated optimization operation model. This model is grounded in the master–slave game theory, offering a strategic approach to harmonize interests and mitigate the risks of unbridled rivalry. In recent years, as the energy market continues to change, an emerging business model is gradually emerging as an energy provider (EP). The participation of EP as an independent entity in the distribution network investment model not only helps realize a win–win situation for multiple stakeholders but also promotes the innovation and sustainable development of the energy industry. However, in the energy system, EPs, grids, microenergy grids (MEGs), and shared energy storage service providers usually belong to different stakeholders, and their respective pursuit of profit maximization can easily lead to uncontrolled competition, which greatly reduces market efficiency. To address the varying ownership structures within the energy system, a refined bilevel coordinated optimization operation model is introduced, rooted in the master–slave game theory. In this model, the EP assumes the role of the master, while the MEG operator and the shared energy storage operator (SESO) act as slaves. A peer‐to‐peer energy‐sharing mechanism between MEGs and an energy trading mechanism between MEGs and shared energy storage is used to further increase the local consumption rate of new energy. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method not only boosts the revenues of an EP, SESO, and MEG operators but also effectively accounts for the MEG's energy storage needs and SESOs' profitability.

Day-ahead bidding strategy of cloud energy storage serving multiple heterogeneous microgrids in the electricity market

User-side Cloud Energy Storage Locating and Capacity Configuration

Cloud Energy Storage Configuration and Settlement for Multi-Type Users

Optimal Planning of Cloud Energy Storage System Serving Multiple High Proportion Renewable Energy Microgrids

Cloud Energy Storage in Multi Energy Systems: Optimal Scheduling and Profit-Sharing Approaches

Research on optimal scheduling decision of multi‐microgrids based on cloud energy storage

Optimal Configuration and Pricing Strategies for Electric-Heat Cloud Energy Storage: A Stackelberg Game Approach

Stackelberg Game Based Pricing Mechanism for Service Provision of Cloud Energy Storage

Selling Renewable Utilization Service to Consumers via Cloud Energy Storage

Day-ahead Bidding Strategy of Regional Integrated Energy Systems Considering Multiple Uncertainties in Electricity Markets

Optimal Capacity Pricing and Sizing Approach of Cloud Energy Storage: A Bi-level Model

A Charging and Discharging Strategy of Cloud Energy Storage with V2G Electric Vehicle Participation

Optimization Strategy for Shared Energy Storage Operators-Multiple Microgrids with Hybrid Game-Theoretic Energy Trading

Day-ahead Strategic Bidding of Multi-Energy Microgrids Participating in Electricity, Thermal Energy, and Hydrogen Markets: A Stochastic Bi-Level Approach

Bidding Strategy for Aggregators of Electric Vehicles in Day-Ahead Electricity Markets

Collaborative operation strategy of multiple microenergy grids considering demand‐side energy‐sharing behavior

Trading strategies of energy storage participation in day-ahead joint market based on Stackelberg game

Day-ahead energy pricing and management method for regional integrated energy systems considering multi-energy demand responses

A dynamic bidding strategy of hybrid energy storage system participating in day-ahead frequency regulation market

A Transaction Model and Profit Allocation Method of Multiple Energy Storage Oriented to Versatile Regulation Demand

Bidding Strategy of Energy Storage in Imperfectly Competitive Flexible Ramping Market Via System Dynamics Method