Abstract:Abstract Spatial skills, which represent the ability to visualize and imagine manipulating objects in one’s mind, are necessary for success in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields and are particularly relied upon by geoscientists. Although scholars recognize the importance of these skills, explicit training is inconsistently offered throughout courses. Furthermore, the relationship between spatial training and students’ perspectives on STEM fields is underexplored. To address this, we developed a case study that included over 700 students enrolled in introductory geology classes over three semesters. These students were randomly divided into control and experimental groups; the experimental group completed 10 spatial training assignments, and the control group completed the course as usual. We relied on situated expectancy-value theory to interpret changes in students’ perceptions of both the course and science overall, and asked the following research questions: (1) Do students who complete the spatial training assignments (i.e., the experimental group) have a statistically significant improvement in their final course grade, self-efficacy, and/or value when compared to the control group? (2) If so, what are the effect sizes of these changes? (3) Is there a minimum number of trainings that need to be completed to achieve this effect? (4) Is there a maximum number of spatial training assignments where we stop seeing improvement (ceiling effect)? We surveyed all students enrolled using 38-question pre- and post-assessments of their self-efficacy, defined as a belief in their ability to succeed, and value. We found that between the control and experimental groups, there were significant differences in students’ pre- to post-changes in perception of science self-efficacy, class self-efficacy, and class value. We found non-significant between-group differences in final grade and science value. We interpret this to mean that using weekly spatial training assignments could increase students’ perceived self-efficacy in their introductory geology course as well as in science more broadly, potentially having ripple effects that support students’ long-term engagement with the sciences. Findings suggest that practitioners should include explicit spatial training in their courses to improve students’ perceptions of the course and science overall. Building on this work may include describing to students the purpose of spatial training (which was deliberately avoided in this study) and outlining the research that supports the relationship between spatial skills and success in STEM fields. Future directions may also include longitudinal tracking of spatial and related skill development throughout students’ college careers.

Geography Education Improves Spatial Ability: Evidence from Fmri and Behavioral Experiments

Using Eye Tracking To Explore The Impacts Of Geography Courses On Map-Based Spatial Ability

Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial training for introductory geology students

Spatial ability and science achievement more closely associated in eighth-graders than in fourth-graders: a large-scale study

An fMRI Study of the Impact of Block Building and Board Games on Spatial Ability

Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance.

Improving Spatial Abilities Through Mindfulness: Effects on the Mental Rotation Task

The impact of an intervention program on students' spatial reasoning: student engagement through mathematics-enhanced learning activities

The influence of spatial ability on undergraduate students' tree-thinking ability

Formation of spatial thinking skills through different training methods

Impact of Learning Methods on Spatial Knowledge Acquisition

Spatial Ability Improvement by Tangible Interaction

Spatial Visualization Ability Assessment for Analyzing Differences and Exploring Influencing Factors: Literature Review with Bibliometrics and Experiment

Supporting senior high-school students’ measurement and geometry performance: Does spatial training transfer to mathematics achievement?

An Empirical Study of Geography Learning on Students’ Emotions and Motivation in Immersive Virtual Reality

Does the use of GIS in geographical education yield better learning outcomes? Evidence from a quasi‐experimental study on air pollution teaching

A Data-Driven, Player-Centric Approach to Evaluating Spatial Skill Training Games

GeoGebra as a spatial skills training tool among science, technology engineering and mathematics students

Early spatial language development and education: a scoping review

Developing spatial visualization and mental rotation with a digital puzzle game at primary school level

Improving middle school students' geometry problem solving ability through hands-on experience: An fNIRS study