Abstract:Upvotes serve important purposes in online social annotation environments. However, limited studies have explored the influential factors affecting peer upvoting in online collaborative learning. In this study, we analysed the factors influencing students' upvotes received from their peers as 91 participants utilized Perusall, an online social annotation system, for collaborative reading. The participants were asked to collaboratively annotate 29 reading materials in a semester. We collected student reading behaviours and analysed their annotations with a text-mining tool of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). Moreover, conditional inference tree was used to determine the relative importance of explanatory factors to the upvotes students received. The results showed that the high-upvote group made significantly more annotations, posted more responses to others' annotations and displayed fewer negative emotions in annotations than those who did not receive upvotes. The two groups of students had no significant differences in the upvotes given to others, as well as cognitive activities and positive emotions involved in annotations. Moreover, the number of annotations was the determining factor in predicting the upvotes that one could receive in social annotation activities. This study has significant practical implications regarding providing interventions in social annotation-based collaborative reading.Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topicWhat this paper addsImplications for practice and/or policy Social annotations enhance students' reading experience, facilitate knowledge sharing and collaboration, promote high-quality learning interactions and ultimately lead to improved performance. In social annotation environments, receiving upvotes from peers is not only a type of feedback but also a form of motivation, social interaction and social validation. No study has explored the influential factors in peer upvoting within social annotation-based learning. This study was the first to examine social annotations through the lens of the community of inquiry framework. We investigated the relationships between students' cognitive and social presence in their annotations and the upvotes they received in an online social annotation environment. Our study revealed the strategies for obtaining upvotes from peers in social annotation-based learning environments. The high-upvote group made significantly more annotations, posted more responses to others' annotations and displayed fewer negative emotions in annotations compared to the low-upvote group. The two groups of students did not show significant differences in the upvotes they gave to others or in the cognitive activities and positive emotions involved in annotations. The number of annotations was the primary factor predicting the number of upvotes received in the collaborative reading. This study could inform the design of future online social annotation systems to better support collaborative learning and peer interaction.

Vote or not? How language mimicry affect peer recognition in an online social Q&A community

Social Influence on Endorsement in Social Q&A Community: Moderating Effects of Temporal and Spatial Factors.

Language style and recognition of the answers in health Q&A community: Moderating effects of medical terminology

Competitive Peer Influence on Knowledge Contribution Behaviors in Online Q&A Communities: a Social Comparison Perspective

Exploring Influential Factors in Peer Upvoting Within Social Annotation

Peer-recognition and Performance in Online Crowdsourcing Communities

Measuring Asymmetric Opinions on Online Social Interrelationship with Language and Network Features

How Learning Effects Influence Knowledge Contribution in Online Q&A Community? A Social Cognitive Perspective

Exploring Linguistic Style Matching in Online Communities: The Role of Social Context and Conversation Dynamics

Is Peer Evaluation of Consumer Online Reviews Socially Embedded? – an Examination Combining Reviewer’s Social Network and Social Identity

Can Online Discussion Participation Predict Group Project Performance? Investigating the Roles of Linguistic Features and Participation Patterns

Comprehending Lexical and Affective Ontologies in the Demographically Diverse Spatial Social Media Discourse

Are Large Language Models Chameleons? An Attempt to Simulate Social Surveys

Examining the Role of Peer Acknowledgements on Social Annotations: Unraveling the Psychological Underpinnings

Nonverbal Peer Feedback and User Contribution in Online Forums: Experimental Evidence of the Role of Attribution and Emotions

Socialized Language Model Smoothing Via Bi-Directional Influence Propagation On Social Networks

Which feedback matters? The role of expressions and valence in continuous high-quality knowledge contribution in the online Q&A community

Examining the Role of Relationship Alignment in Large Language Models

How Review Sentiment and Readability Affect Online Peer Evaluation Votes? – an Examination Combining Reviewer’s Social Identity and Social Network

Can Language Model Moderators Improve the Health of Online Discourse?

Characterizing the Language of Online Communities and its Relation to Community Reception