Abstract:Legal case retrieval has received increasing attention in recent years. However, compared to ad-hoc retrieval tasks, legal case retrieval has its unique challenges. First, case documents are rather lengthy and contain complex legal structures. Therefore, it is difficult for most existing dense retrieval models to encode an entire document and capture its inherent complex structure information. Most existing methods simply truncate part of the document content to meet the input length limit of PLMs, which will lead to information loss. Additionally, the definition of relevance in the legal domain differs from that in the general domain. Previous semantic-based or lexical-based methods fail to provide a comprehensive understanding of the relevance of legal cases. In this paper, we propose a S tructured L egal case R etrieval (SLR) framework, which incorporates internal and external structural information to address the above two challenges. Specifically, to avoid the truncation of long legal documents, the internal structural information, which is the organization pattern of legal documents, can be utilized to split a case document into segments. By dividing the document-level semantic matching task into segment-level subtasks, SLR can separately process segments using different methods based on the characteristic of each segment. In this way, the key elements of a case document can be highlighted without losing other content information. Secondly, towards a better understanding of relevance in the legal domain, we investigate the connections between criminal charges appearing in large-scale case corpus to generate a charge-wise relation graph. Then, the similarity between criminal charges can be pre-computed as the external structural information to enhance the recognition of relevant cases. Finally, a learning-to-rank algorithm integrates the features collected from internal and external structures to output the final retrieval results. Experimental results on public legal case retrieval benchmarks demonstrate the superior effectiveness of SLR over existing state-of-the-art baselines, including traditional bag-of-words and neural-based methods. Furthermore, we conduct a case study to visualize how the proposed model focuses on key elements and improves retrieval performance.

Investigating Conversational Agent Action in Legal Case Retrieval.

Investigating Conversational Agent Action in Legal Case Retrieval

Conversational Vs Traditional: Comparing Search Behavior and Outcome in Legal Case Retrieval

Query Generation and Buffer Mechanism: Towards a better conversational agent for legal case retrieval

Investigating User Behavior in Legal Case Retrieval

Leveraging Event Schema to Ask Clarifying Questions for Conversational Legal Case Retrieval

Investigating the Influence of Legal Case Retrieval Systems on Users' Decision Process

Understanding Relevance Judgments in Legal Case Retrieval

Still Haven't Found What You're Looking For -- Detecting the Intent of Web Search Missions from User Interaction Features

Improving Legal Case Retrieval with Brain Signals

BERT-PLI: Modeling Paragraph-Level Interactions for Legal Case Retrieval

Legal Case Retrieval: A Survey of the State of the Art

Iterative Self-Supervised Learning for Legal Similar Case Retrieval

Caseformer: Pre-training for Legal Case Retrieval Based on Inter-Case Distinctions

An Intent Taxonomy of Legal Case Retrieval

Incorporating Structural Information into Legal Case Retrieval

Prompt-based Effective Input Reformulation for Legal Case Retrieval

Toward Connecting Speech Acts and Search Actions in Conversational Search Tasks

AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation

Building a Legal Dialogue System: Development Process, Challenges and Opportunities