Abstract:Due to the complexity of software systems, defects are inevitable. Understanding the types of defects could help developers to adopt measures in current and future software releases. In practice, developers often categorize defects into various types. One common categorization is based on fault triggers of defects. Fault trigger is a set of conditions which activate a defect (i.e., Fault) and propagate the defect into a failure. In general, there are two types of defect based fault triggering conditions, Bohrbug and Mandelbug. Bohrbug refers to a bug which can be easily isolated, and its activation and error propagation is simple. Mandelbug refers to a bug whose activation and/or error propagation is complex (e.g., A time lag between the fault activation and the failure occurrence). With these category labels, developers can better perform post-mortem analysis to identify common characteristic of the defects, and design specific fault-tolerance mechanisms. However, in most software systems, these category labels are often unavailable. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose a text mining solution which categorize defects into fault trigger categories by analyzing the natural-language description of bug reports. A previous study shows that Mandelbug is more complex and needs more time to be fixed. Thus, to better identify Mandelbugs, we propose a novel Fuzzy Set based Feature Selection algorithm named USES, which selects the features (i.e., Terms) which have high ability to distinguish Mandelbugs from Bohrbugs. USES first caches a set of terms based on their fuzzy affinity scores to Bohrbug or Mandelbug. Next, it iterates many times, and in each iteration, it selects a subset of terms, and builds a classifier on these terms. USES selects the classifier and the terms which could achieve the best performance on a training data. We evaluate our solution on 4 datasets including Linux, Mysql, Apache HTTPD, and AXIS containing a total of 809 bug reports. We show that USES with naive Bayes multinomial achieves the best performance, it achieves Mandelbug F-measure scores of 0.298 - 0.615. We also compare USES with other baseline approaches. The results show that USES on average improves Mandelbug F-measure scores of the best performing baseline by 12.3%.

An Empirical Study of the Bug Link Rate

Empirical Evaluation of Bug Linking

An Empirical Study of Bug Report Field Reassignment.

An Empirical Study of Bugs in Build Process

Predicting concurrency bugs: how many, what kind and where are they?

An Empirical Study of Bug Fixing Rate.

Automatic Defect Categorization Based on Fault Triggering Conditions

Investigating the Impact of Bug Dependencies on Bug-Fixing Time Prediction

A Comparative Study of Supervised Learning Algorithms for Re-opened Bug Prediction.

High-Impact Bug Report Identification with Imbalanced Learning Strategies

Automated Identification of High Impact Bug Reports Leveraging Imbalanced Learning Strategies

An empirical study of issue-link algorithms: which issue-link algorithms should we use?

An Empirical Study on Bug Severity Estimation using Source Code Metrics and Static Analysis

Can Requirements Dependency Network Be Used As Early Indicator of Software Integration Bugs?

Evaluating Link Prediction Methods

Is Learning-to-Rank Cost-Effective in Recommending Relevant Files for Bug Localization?

How Well Industry-Level Cause Bisection Works in Real-World: A Study on Linux Kernel

Why and How Bug Blocking Relations Are Breakable: an Empirical Study on Breakable Blocking Bugs

An Empirical Study of Bugs in Machine Learning Systems

How Many Versions Does a Bug Live In? an Empirical Study on Text Features for Bug Lifecycle Prediction.

Impact Analysis of Cross-Project Bugs on Software Ecosystems