Abstract:T cell receptors (TCR) define the specificity of T cells and are responsible for their interaction with peptide antigen targets presented in complex with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Understanding the rules underlying this interaction hence forms the foundation for our understanding of basic adaptive immunology. Over the last decade, efforts have been dedicated to developing assays for high throughput identification of peptide-specific TCRs. Based on such data, several computational methods have been proposed for predicting the TCR-pMHC interaction. The general conclusion from these studies is that the prediction of TCR interactions with MHC-peptide complexes remains highly challenging. Several reasons form the basis for this including scarcity and quality of data, and ill-defined modeling objectives imposed by the high redundancy of the available data. In this work, we propose a framework for dealing with this redundancy, allowing us to address essential questions related to the modeling of TCR specificity including the use of peptide- versus pan-specific models, how to best define negative data, and the performance impact of integrating of CDR1 and 2 loops. Further, we illustrate how and why it is strongly recommended to include simple similarity-based modeling approaches when validating an improved predictive power of machine learning models, and that such validation should include a performance evaluation as a function of "distance" to the training data, to quantify the potential for generalization of the proposed model. The conclusion of the work is that, given current data, TCR specificity is best modeled using peptide-specific approaches, integrating information from all 6 CDR loops, and with negative data constructed from a combination of true and mislabeled negatives. Comparing such machine learning models to similarity-based approaches demonstrated an increased performance gain of the former as the "distance" to the training data was increased; thus demonstrating an improved generalization ability of the machine learning-based approaches. We believe these results demonstrate that the outlined modeling framework and proposed evaluation strategy form a solid basis for investigating the modeling of TCR specificities and that adhering to such a framework will allow for faster progress within the field. The final devolved model, NetTCR-2.1, is available at https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?NetTCR-2.1.

Pretraining Transformers for TCR-pMHC Binding Prediction.

AttnTAP: A Dual-input Framework Incorporating the Attention Mechanism for Accurately Predicting TCR-peptide Binding

Attention-aware contrastive learning for predicting T cell receptor-antigen binding specificity

Predicting TCR sequences for unseen antigen epitopes using structural and sequence features

pan-MHC and cross-Species Prediction of T Cell Receptor-Antigen Binding

Enhancing TCR specificity predictions by combined pan- and peptide-specific training, loss-scaling, and sequence similarity integration

ATM-TCR: TCR-Epitope Binding Affinity Prediction Using a Multi-Head Self-Attention Model

MATE-Pred: Multimodal Attention-based TCR-Epitope interaction Predictor

TEPCAM: Prediction of T-cell receptor-epitope binding specificity via interpretable deep learning

tcrLM: a lightweight protein language model for predicting T cell receptor and epitope binding specificity

NetTCR: sequence-based prediction of TCR binding to peptide-MHC complexes using convolutional neural networks

Pan-Peptide Meta Learning for T-cell Receptor–antigen Binding Recognition

T cell receptor binding prediction: A machine learning revolution

VitTCR: A Deep Learning Method for Peptide Recognition Prediction

Performance comparison of TCR-pMHC prediction tools reveals a strong data dependency

A unified cross-attention model for predicting antigen binding specificity to both HLA and TCR molecules

T-Cell Receptor Cognate Target Prediction Based on Paired α and β Chain Sequence and Structural CDR Loop Similarities

NetTCR-2.1: Lessons and guidance on how to develop models for TCR specificity predictions

DapPep: Domain Adaptive Peptide-agnostic Learning for Universal T-cell Receptor-antigen Binding Affinity Prediction

MIX-TPI: a flexible prediction framework for TCR–pMHC interactions based on multimodal representations