Abstract: Propensity score methods have been shown to be powerful in obtaining efficient estimators of average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data, especially under the existence of confounding factors. When estimating, deciding which type of covariates need to be included in the propensity score function is important, since incorporating some unnecessary covariates may amplify both bias and variance of estimators of ATE. In this paper, we show that including additional instrumental variables that satisfy the exclusion restriction for outcome will do harm to the statistical efficiency. Also, we prove that, controlling for covariates that appear as outcome predictors, i.e. predict the outcomes and are irrelevant to the exposures, can help reduce the asymptotic variance of ATE estimation. We also note that, efficiently estimating the ATE by non-parametric or semi-parametric methods require the estimated propensity score function, as described in Hirano et al. (2003)\cite{Hirano2003}. Such estimation procedure usually asks for many regularity conditions, Rothe (2016)\cite{Rothe2016} also illustrated this point and proposed a known propensity score (KPS) estimator that requires mild regularity conditions and is still fully efficient. In addition, we introduce a linearly modified (LM) estimator that is nearly efficient in most general settings and need not estimation of the propensity score function, hence convenient to calculate. The construction of this estimator borrows idea from the interaction estimator of Lin (2013)\cite{Lin2013}, in which regression adjustment with interaction terms are applied to deal with data arising from a completely randomized experiment. As its name suggests, the LM estimator can be viewed as a linear modification on the IPW estimator using known propensity scores. We will also investigate its statistical properties both analytically and numerically.

Kernel Mean Matching with Mahalanobis Distance for Causal Inference of Time-to-event Outcome

Causal effect estimation in survival analysis with high dimensional confounders

Sufficient dimension reduction for average causal effect estimation

Matching Methods for Causal Inference with Time‐Series Cross‐Sectional Data

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

GBM Propensity Score Weighting for Causal Inference Research

Kernel-Distance-Based Covariate Balancing

Causal K-Means Clustering

Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference

Causal Discovery by Kernel Deviance Measures with Heterogeneous Transforms

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects Via a High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Propensity score weighting for causal inference with multiple treatments

Causal Inference Meets Machine Learning

Differentiated Matching for Individual and Average Treatment Effect Estimation

Matching Algorithms for Causal Inference with Multiple Treatments

Posterior predictive treatment assignment methods for causal inference in the context of time-varying treatments

Neural Score Matching for High-Dimensional Causal Inference

Causal Inference using Multivariate Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models with Longitudinal Data

Kernel Estimation of Bivariate Time-varying Coefficient Model for Longitudinal Data with Terminal Event

Variance Reduction for Causal Inference

Matched Machine Learning: A Generalized Framework for Treatment Effect Inference With Learned Metrics