Abstract:OBJECTIVES:To obtain perfusion as well as diffusion information in normal breast tissues and breast lesions from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging with biexponential analysis of multiple b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and compare these parameters to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained with monoexponential analysis in their ability to discriminate benign lesions and malignant tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In this prospective study, informed consent was acquired from all patients. Eighty-four patients with 40 malignant tumors, 41 benign lesions, 30 simple cysts and 39 normal breast tissues were imaged at 1.5 T utilizing contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DWI using 12 b values (range: 0-1000 s/mm(2)). Tissue diffusivity (D), perfusion fraction (f) and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) were calculated using segmented biexponential analysis. ADC (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm(2)) was calculated with monoexponential fitting of the DWI data. D, f, D* and ADC values were obtained for normal breast tissues, simple cysts, benign lesions and malignant tumors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for all DWI parameters. RESULTS:There was good interobserver agreement on the measurements between the 2 observers. D values were significantly different among malignant tumors, benign lesions, simple cysts and normal breast tissues (P = 0.000) and it was the same result for f, D* and ADC values. Further comparisons of these 4 parameters between every single pair were as the following. D and ADC values of malignant tumors were significantly smaller than those of benign lesions, simple cysts and normal tissues (P = 0.000, respectively). The f value of malignant tumors was significantly higher than that of benign lesions, simple cysts and normal breast tissues (P = 0.001, P = 0.000, and P = 0.000). D and ADC values demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity in differentiating benign lesions and malignant tumors, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.952 and 0.945, respectively, while f and D* with the lower AUC of 0.723 and 0.630, respectively. Combining f and D values had a sensitivity up to 98.75%. CONCLUSION:DWI response curves in malignant tumors, benign lesions and normal fibroglandular tissues are found to be biexponential fit in comparison with the monoexponential fit for simple cysts. IVIM provides separate quantitative measurement of D for cellularity and f and D* for vascularity and is helpful for differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Comparison of Image Quality and Quantitative Parameters in Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging at 3-T Based on Turbo Spin-Echo and Echo-Planar Imaging in Patients with Oral Cancer.

Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Mr Imaging In Breast Cancer: Quantitative Analysis For Characterizing Lesions

The relationship between parameters measured using intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a longitudinal cohort study

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI for the Differentiation of Benign, Intermediate, and Malignant Solid Soft‐tissue Tumors

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: Comparison with conventional DWI

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted MRI of Cervical Cancer - Correlated with Tumor Differentiation and Perfusion.

Intra voxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted Imaging Quantitative Parameters in Evaluating Differentiated Degrees of Pancreatic Cancer

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation of lung cancer from obstructive lung consolidation: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic analysis from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

Comparative Study of Conventional Diffusion- Weighted Imaging and Introvoxel Incoherent Motion in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Comparison of Parameters for Diffusionweighted Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Lung Cancer Patients with Different Histopathological Subtypes

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging of solitary pulmonary lesions: initial study with gradient- and spin-echo sequences

The feasibility of intravoxel incoherent motion to indicate immunohistochemical characteristics in breast cancer

Can intravoxel incoherent motion ( IVIM ) Replace the Conventional DWI Combined with DCE in Clinical Detection of Prostate Cancer ?

Differentiation Between Orbital Malignant and Benign Tumors Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Comparison of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Mr Imaging with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mri for Differentiating Lung Cancer from Benign Solitary Pulmonary Lesions

Comparision Between Echo Planar Imaging-Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Diffusion Imaging in the Diagnosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Perfusion-Related Intravoxel Incoherent Motion DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Rectal Cancer

Preliminary Study of Ivim-Dwi and Dce-Mri in Early Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal Carcinoma: Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MRI Parameters and Histopathological Correlations

Intra-voxel Incoherent Motion Parameters of Rectal Cancer at 3.0 T MRI:effect of Region of Interest on Measurement Consistency of Parameters