Hydrological Effects of Soil Layers in Different Vegetation Types on the Eastern Slopes of the Helan Mountains

HE Wenqiang,CHEN Lin,PANG Danbo,CAO Menghao,ZHANG Yaqi,LI Xuebin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2023.02.012

2023-01-01

Abstract:【Objective】The study compared the changing patterns and differences of the hydrological effects of soils in different slope orientations, soil layers and vegetation types in small watersheds, to provide a theoretical basis for the construction of regional forest hydrological cycle and water-conserving forests.【Method】The Xiangshigou sub-basin on the east slope of Ningxia Helan Mountain Nature Reserve was taken as the study area, while the desert steppe of the shaded slope, Amygdalus mongolica bushes, Ulmus glaucescens forest, Pinus tabuliformis forest, mixed forest, Picea crassifolia forest and subalpine meadow were selected to study the soil physical properties and hydrological effects by field survey sampling and indoor analysis.【Result】The differences in soil water content,total porosity, bulk weight, capillary porosity, non-capillary porosity, the maximum water holding capacity and maximum water storage capacity between slope orientations and vegetation types were significant（P ＜ 0.01）. Between different slope orientations, the maximum water holding capacity was greater on shady slopes（58.94%） than that on sunny slopes（44.13%）; the maximum water storage capacity was greater on shady slopes（562.03 t/hm2） than that on sunny slopes（502.72 t/hm2）; between different vegetation types, the maximum water holding capacity showed Picea crassifolia forest（70.15%） ＞ Mixed forests（65.73%） ＞ Pinus tabuliformis forest（59.62%） ＞Subalpine meadows（57.61%） ＞ Ulmus glaucescens forest（37.19%） ＞ Amygdalus mongolica bushes（36.82%） ＞ Desert grassland（29.57%）. The maximum water storage performance was Mixed forests（607.24 t/hm2） ＞ Picea crassifolia forest（601.97 t/hm2） ＞Pinus tabuliformis forest（560.03 t/hm2） ＞ Subalpine meadows（549.33 t/hm2） ＞ Ulmus glaucescens forest（480.35 t/hm2） ＞Amygdalus mongolica bushes（457.21 t/hm2） ＞ Desert grassland（437.17 t/hm2）. At the same time, soil water holding capacity, water storage capacity and soil porosity were significantly positively correlated with elevation, vegetation cover and soil water content（P ＜0.01） and negatively correlated with soil water capacity（P ＜ 0.01）, and the contribution of total soil porosity to the soil hydrological effect was the largest, reaching 86.10%.【Conclusion】The physical properties and water content capacity of the soil on shady slopes are higher than those on sunny slopes, and the water content capacity of coniferous forests at high altitudes, such as Picea crassifolia forest, Pinus tabuliformis forest and the mixed forests, is generally higher than that of desert grasslands at low altitudes. Additionally, the physical properties of soil are important factors in the hydrological effects of soil.