Is Dishonesty Normally Distributed? Evidence from Six Behavioral Experiments and a Simulation Study

Qianyu Jiang,Yuyang Zhang,Zibin Zhu,Jieting Zhang,Ke Ding,Jinting Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112105

IF: 3.95

2023-01-01

Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract:How does dishonesty differ among individuals? Some studies using lottery tasks implied that people were more likely to be partially dishonest, whereas others suggested that most people were fully honest or fully dishonest. For a comprehensive investigation of the dishonesty distribution, Study 1 analyzed the data from six behavioral experiments (N = 2584) and found that dishonesty levels were not normally distributed in the general public, college students, or inmates, whether using lottery task or other tasks. Specifically, the distribution of dishonesty was positively skewed, most of the participants were fully honest. As the mean dishonesty level of the sample increased, the dishonesty distribution tended to change from an L-shape to a U-shape, except for the inverted Ushape in the lottery task. Simulation data (Study 2) suggested that the exception in the lottery task may result from the binomial distribution of the lotteries. The findings revealed that, unlike most traits, dishonesty levels were distributed in an L-shape or U-shape instead of a normal distribution across populations and tasks. We discussed the evolutionary adaptation of the polarization of dishonesty and offered methodological recommendations for future research on dishonesty.