Abstract:BackgroundAccording to current evidence, adding decompressive craniectomy (DC) to best medical therapy reduces case fatality rate of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by 50–75%. There is currently little information available regarding the outcome of subgroups, in particular of patients with extensive infarctions exceeding the territory of the middle cerebral artery.MethodsThe records of 101 patients with large hemispheric infarctions undergoing DC were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-seven patients had additional ACA and/or PCA infarcts. Sequential CTs were used for postoperative follow-up. Intracranial pressure (ICP) was monitored via a ventricular catheter in comatose patients. The main aim of treatment was to keep midline shift below 10 mm and ICP below 20 mmHg. If midline shift increased despite preceding DC, repeat surgery with removal of clearly necrotic tissue was considered. For the current analysis, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at 14 days and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months were used as outcome parameters. mRS 2 and 3 were defined as “moderate disability”, mRS 4 as “severe disability”, and mRS 5 and 6 as “poor outcome”. These outcome parameters were correlated to age, gender, side, vascular territory, and time delay after stroke, GCS at the time of decompression, maximum ICP, maximum midline shift, and delay of maximum shift.ResultsThe median age of the 39 female and 62 male patients was 56 years (range, 5–79 years). Overall, 12 patients died in the acute stage (11.9%). Twenty-three (22.8%) patients recovered to moderate disability at 3 months (mRS ≤ 3), 45 (44.6%) to severe disability and 33 (32.6%) suffered a poor outcome (mRS 5 or 6). Twenty patients (19.8%) required additional necrosectomy due to secondary increasing midline shift and/or intracranial hypertension. Patients recovering to moderate disability at 3 months were in the median 10 years younger than patients with less favorable outcome (P < 0.001) and had a higher GCS prior to surgery (P < 0.001). Eleven of the 27 patients with infarctions exceeding the MCA territory needed secondary surgery, indicating a higher necrosectomy rate as for isolated MCA infarction. At 3 months, the distribution of the outcomes in terms of mRS was comparable between the patients suffering from extended infarctions and patients having isolated MCA stroke. Infarctions exceeding the territory of the middle cerebral artery were seen in 30% of the group recovering to moderate disability and thus as frequent as in the groups suffering a less favorable outcome.ConclusionsIntensified postoperative management including possible secondary decompression with necrosectomy may further reduce case fatality rate of patients with large hemispheric infarction. Age above 60 years and severely reduced level of consciousness are the most significant factors heralding unfavorable recovery. Patients suffering infarctions exceeding the MCA territory have a comparable chance of favorable recovery as patients with isolated MCA infarction.

Long‐term cognitive outcomes after decompressive hemicraniectomy for right‐hemisphere large middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke

Long-term outcome after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction

Is Decompressive Craniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction of Any Worth?

Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction including patients with additional involvement of the anterior and/or posterior cerebral artery territory—outcome analysis and definition of prognostic factors

Effect of decompressive hemicraniectomy performed within the first 48 hours on mortality in the treatment of malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery

Decompressive hemicraniectomy in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: A real-world study

Functional outcome and mortality prediction after decompressive craniectomy in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction

Predictors of decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery stroke

Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality after Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Malignant Ischemic Stroke

Radiological and blood markers predicting long term neurological outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant ischemic stroke: a preliminary single center study

Outcomes of Hypothermia in Addition to Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Treatment of Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Hemicraniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Current Status and Future Directions

Large Size Hemicraniectomy Reduces Early Herniation in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction

Single-centre real-life observational study on mortality and outcomes: decompressive craniectomy and brain death in traumatic brain injury, haemorrhage, and other cerebral diseases

No Harmful Effect of Endovascular Treatment before Decompressive Surgery—Implications for Handling Patients with Space-Occupying Brain Infarction

Decompressive Craniectomy in Treatment of Space-Occupying Massive Hemispheric Infarction: A Short-term Evaluation

Decompressive craniectomy for patients with malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials

Abstract TP198: Factors Associated With Need for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients

Outcomes of decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery stroke in an academic hospital in Brazil

Clinical Analysis of Microvascular Reconstruction Combined With Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients With Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarctions

Safety and Outcome of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy After Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review