The Outcome of Ibrutinib-Based Regimens in Relapsed/refractory Central Nervous System Lymphoma and the Potential Impact of Genomic Variants

Shu Wang,YuQi Zhu,Xiaohan Qian,Tianling Ding,Yan Yuan,Yuan Li,Hanfeng Wu,Tong Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/159288
2023-01-01
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Abstract:BACKGROUND Relapsed/refractory (r/r) central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) exhibits aggressive behavior and poor outcomes. As an effective bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib yields benefits in B-cell malignancies. OBJECTIVES We aimed to explore the efficacy of ibrutinib in treating r/r CNSL patients, and whether genomic variants impact treatment outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS The ibrutinib-based regimens in 12 r/r primary CNSL (PCNSL) and 2 secondary CNSL (SCNSL) patients were analyzed retrospectively. The impact of genetic variants on the effects of treatments was examined using whole-exome sequencing (WES) technology. RESULTS In PCNSL, the overall response rate was 75%, with median overall survival (OS) not reached (NR) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 4 months. Both SCNSL patients responded to ibrutinib, with median OS NR and PFS of 0.5-1.5 months. Infections were common during ibrutinib therapy (42.86%). The PCNSL patients harboring gene mutations in PIM1, MYD88 and CD79B, and the proximal BCR and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathways responded to ibrutinib. Patients who harbored simple genetic variants and those with a low tumor mutation burden (TMB; 2.39-5.56/Mb) responded swiftly and maintained remission for more than 10 months. A patient with a TMB of 11/Mb responded to ibrutinib but continued to experience disease progression. In contrast, patients with complex genomic features, especially extremely high TMB (58.39/Mb), responded poorly to ibrutinib. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that ibrutinib-based therapy is effective and relatively safe for the treatment of r/r CNSL. Patients with less genomic complexity, especially with regard to TMB, might benefit more from ibrutinib regimens.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?