Pharmacological Characterization of the Endocannabinoid Sensor GRABeCB2.0

Simar Singh,Dennis Sarroza,Anthony English,Maya McGrory,Ao Dong,Larry Zweifel,Benjamin B. Land,Yulong Li,Michael R. Bruchas,Nephi Stella
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2023.0036
2024-01-01
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Abstract:Introduction: The endocannabinoids (eCBs), 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and arachidonoyl ethanolamine (AEA), are produced by separate enzymatic pathways, activate cannabinoid (CB) receptors with distinct pharmacological profiles, and differentially regulate pathophysiological processes. The genetically encoded sensor, GRAB(eCB2.0), detects real-time changes in eCB levels in cells in culture and preclinical model systems; however, its activation by eCB analogues produced by cells and by phyto-CBs remains uncharacterized, a current limitation when interpreting changes in its response. This information could provide additional utility for the tool in in vivo pharmacology studies of phyto-CB action. Materials and Methods: GRAB(eCB2.0) was expressed in cultured HEK293 cells. Live cell confocal microscopy and high-throughput fluorescent signal measurements. Results: 2-AG increased GRAB(eCB2.0) fluorescent signal (EC50=85 nM), and the cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) antagonist, SR141716 (SR1), decreased GRAB(eCB2.0) signal (IC50=3.3 nM), responses that mirror their known potencies at the CB1R. GRAB(eCB2.0) fluorescent signal also increased in response to AEA (EC50=815 nM), the eCB analogues 2-linoleoylglycerol and 2-oleoylglycerol (EC50=632 and 868 nM, respectively), Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC), and Delta(8)-THC (EC50=1.6 and 2.0 mu M, respectively), and the artificial CB1R agonist, CP55,940 (CP; EC50=82 nM); however their potencies were less than what has been described at CB1R. Cannabidiol (CBD) did not affect basal GRAB(eCB2.0) fluorescent signal and yet reduced the 2-AG stimulated GRAB(eCB2.0) responses (IC50=9.7 nM). Conclusions: 2-AG and SR1 modulate the GRAB(eCB2.0) fluorescent signal with EC50 values that mirror their potencies at CB1R, whereas AEA, eCB analogues, THC, and CP increase GRAB(eCB2.0) fluorescent signal with EC50 values significantly lower than their potencies at CB1R. CBD reduces the 2-AG response without affecting basal signal, suggesting that GRAB(eCB2.0) retains the negative allosteric modulator (NAM) property of CBD at CB1R. This study describes the pharmacological profile of GRAB(eCB2.0) to improve interpretation of changes in fluorescent signal in response to a series of known eCBs and CB1R ligands.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?