DiatomNet V1.0: A Novel Approach for Automatic Diatom Testing for Drowning Diagnosis in Forensically Biomedical Application

Ji Zhang,Duarte Nuno Vieira,Qi Cheng,Yongzheng Zhu,Kaifei Deng,Jianhua Zhang,Zhiqiang Qin,Qiran Sun,Tianye Zhang,Kaijun Ma,Xiaofeng Zhang,Ping Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107434

IF: 6.1

2023-01-01

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract:Background and Objective: Diatom testing is supportive for drowning diagnosis in forensic medicine. How-ever, it is very time-consuming and labor-intensive for technicians to identify microscopically a handful of diatoms in sample smears, especially under complex observable backgrounds. Recently, we success-fully developed a software, named DiatomNet v].0 intended to automatically identify diatom frustules in a whole slide under a clear background. Here, we introduced this new software and performed a val-idation study to elucidate how DiatomNet v].0 improved its performance with the influence of visible impurities.Methods: DiatomNet v] .0 has an intuitive, user-friendly and easy-to-learn graphical user interface (GUI) built in the Drupal and its core architecture for slide analysis including a convolutional neural network (CNN) is written in Python language. The build-in CNN model was evaluated for diatom identification under very complex observable backgrounds with mixtures of common impurities, including carbon pig-ments and sand sediments. Compared to the original model, the enhanced model following optimization with limited new datasets was evaluated systematically by independent testing and random control trials (RCTs).Results: In independent testing, the original DiatomNet v].0 was moderately affected, especially when higher densities of impurities existed, and achieved a low recall of 0.817 and F1 score of 0.858 but good precision of 0.905. Following transfer learning with limited new datasets, the enhanced version had better results, with recall and F1 score values of 0.968. A comparative study on real slides showed that the upgraded DiatomNet v].0 obtained F1 scores of 0.86 and 0.84 for carbon pigment and sand sediment, respectively, slightly worse than manual identification (carbon pigment: 0.91; sand sediment: 0.86), but much less time was needed.Conclusions: The study verified that forensic diatom testing with aid of DiatomNet v].0 is much more efficient than traditionally manual identification even under complex observable backgrounds. In terms of forensic diatom testing, we proposed a suggested standard on build-in model optimization and evaluation to strengthen the software's generalization in potentially complex conditions.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.