Abstract:Regular monitoring of common physiological signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation, can be an effective way to either prevent or detect many kinds of chronic conditions. In particular, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a worldwide concern. According to the World Health Organization, 32% of all deaths worldwide are from CVDs. In addition, stress-related illnesses cost $190 billion in healthcare costs per year. Currently, contact devices are required to extract most of an individual's physiological information, which can be uncomfortable for users and can cause discomfort. However, in recent years, remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) technology is gaining interest, which enables contactless monitoring of the blood volume pulse signal using a regular camera, and ultimately can provide the same physiological information as a contact device. In this paper, we propose a benchmark comparison using a new multimodal database consisting of 56 subjects where each subject was submitted to three different tasks. Each subject wore a wearable device capable of extracting photoplethysmography signals and was filmed to allow simultaneous rPPG signal extraction. Several experiments were conducted, including a comparison between information from contact and remote signals and stress state recognition. Results have shown that in this dataset, rPPG signals were capable of dealing with motion artifacts better than contact PPG sensors and overall had better quality if compared to the signals from the contact sensor. Moreover, the statistical analysis of the variance method had shown that at least two heart-rate variability (HRV) features, NNi 20 and SAMPEN, were capable of differentiating between stress and non-stress states. In addition, three features, inter-beat interval (IBI), NNi 20, and SAMPEN, were capable of differentiating between tasks relating to different levels of difficulty. Furthermore, using machine learning to classify a "stressed" or "unstressed" state, the models were able to achieve an accuracy score of 83.11%.

To Investigate the Feasibility of Palm-Video-Based IPPG Technique

An iPPG-Based Device for Pervasive Monitoring of Multi-Dimensional Cardiovascular Hemodynamics

Motion Resistant Facial Video based Heart Rate Estimation Method using Head-Mounted Camera

Robust and Remote Photoplethysmography Based on Smartphone Imaging of the Human Palm

Robust heart-rate estimation from facial videos using Project_ICA

Fair Non-contact Blood Pressure Estimationusing Imaging Photoplethysmography

Full-Body Cardiovascular Sensing with Remote Photoplethysmography

Evaluating Visual Photoplethysmography Method

Remote Heart Rate Measurement from Face Videos under Realistic Situations

Robust Method for Non-Contact Vital Sign Measurement in Videos Acquired in Real-World Light Settings From Skin Less Affected by Blood Perfusion

Region of Interest Analysis Using Delaunay Triangulation for Facial Video-Based Heart Rate Estimation

Comparison of PPG and BCG Features for Camera-based Blood Pressure Estimation by Ice Water Stimulation.

Method of Remote Photoplethysmography Robust to Interference in Video Registration of Human Facial Skin

Video-based Human Heart Rate Measurement Using Joint Blind Source Separation

A robust non-contact heart rate estimation from facial video based on a non-parametric signal extraction model

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) in the wild: Remote heart rate imaging via online webcams

A Feasibility Study of a Video-Based Heart Rate Estimation Method with Convolutional Neural Networks

Robust blood pressure measurement from facial videos in diverse environments

Hybrid Optical Unobtrusive Blood Pressure Measurements

Evaluation of the signal quality of wrist-based photoplethysmography

Camera-Based Remote Physiology Sensing for Hundreds of Subjects Across Skin Tones