Abstract:Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent and disabling disease. Currently, patients' treatment choices depend on their clinical symptoms observed by clinicians, which are subjective. Rich evidence suggests that different functional networks' dysfunctions correspond to different intervention preferences. In this study, we aimed to develop a prediction model based on data-driven subgroups to provide treatment recommendations.Methods: All 630 participants enrolled from four sites underwent functional magnetic resonances imaging at baseline. In the discovery data set (n = 228), we first identified MDD subgroups by the hierarchical clustering method using the canonical variates of resting-state functional connectivity (FC) through canonical correlation analyses. The demographic symptom improvement and FC were compared among subgroups. The preference intervention for each subgroup was also determined. Next, we predicted the individual treatment strategy. Specifically, a patient was assigned into predefined subgroups based on FC similarities and then his/her treatment strategy was determined by the subgroups' preferred interventions.Results: Three subgroups with specific treatment recommendations were emerged, including (1) a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors-oriented subgroup with early improvements in working and activities, (2) a stimulation-oriented subgroup with more alleviation in suicide, and (3) a selective serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors-oriented subgroup with more alleviation in hypochondriasis. Through cross-dataset testing, respectively, conducted on three testing data sets, results showed an overall accuracy of 72.83%.Conclusions: Our works revealed the correspondences between subgroups and their treatment preferences and predicted individual treatment strategy based on such correspondences. Our model has the potential to support psychiatrists in early clinical decision making for better treatment outcomes. Impact statementThis study proposes a novel framework to provide treatment recommendations by integrating resting-state functional connectivity and advanced machine learning technique in a large data set. Our data-driven approach is able to objectively and automatically cluster patients into different subgroups and recommends the optimal treatment strategies based on specific brain circuits and clinical symptoms. Our results have the potential to support psychiatrists in early clinical decision making for better treatment outcomes.

Biotypes of Major Depressive Disorder Identified by a Multiview Clustering Framework

Redefining and subtyping of major depression based on brain functional connectivity signatures with high generalization: an ensemble hybrid framework

Biotypes of major depressive disorder: Neuroimaging evidence from resting-state default mode network patterns.

Identifying Subgroups of Major Depressive Disorder Using Brain Structural Covariance Networks and Mapping of Associated Clinical and Cognitive Variables

Data-driven Clustering Differentiates Subtypes of Major Depressive Disorder with Distinct Brain Connectivity and Symptom Features

Dissecting Biological Heterogeneity in Major Depressive Disorder Based on Neuroimaging Subtypes with Multi-Omics Data

White Matter Abnormalities in Major Depression Biotypes Identified by Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Transcriptomic Similarity Informs Neuromorphic Deviations in Depression Biotypes.

Dimensional subtyping of first-episode drug-naïve major depressive disorder: A multisite resting-state fMRI study

Mapping Neurophysiological Subtypes of Major Depressive Disorder Using Normative Models of the Functional Connectome

Machine Learning of Functional Connectivity to Biotype Alcohol and Nicotine Use Disorders

Neurophysiological Stratification of Major Depressive Disorder by Distinct Trajectories

Connectome Analysis of Functional and Structural Hemispheric Brain Networks in Major Depressive Disorder

Predicting Treatment Selections for Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder According to Functional Connectivity Subgroups

Dimensional Analysis of Atypical Functional Connectivity of Major Depression Disorder and Bipolar Disorder.

Identifying two distinct neuroanatomical subtypes of first-episode depression using heterogeneity through discriminative analysis

Brain functional networks and structures that categorize type 2 bipolar disorder and major depression

Probing the Clinical and Brain Structural Boundaries of Bipolar and Major Depressive Disorder

Identification of depression subtypes and relevant brain regions using a data-driven approach

Identification of psychiatric disorder subtypes from functional connectivity patterns in resting-state electroencephalography

Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder Based on Individualized Brain Functional and Structural Connectivity