Abstract:The effectiveness of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) performance has been widely discussed and is often linked to corporate financial performance or firm value by academics and practitioners. However, a significant research gap remains unexplored; specifically, prior scholars have ignored path research about the effect of ESG performance on corporate innovation, and they have also ignored the impacts of the heterogeneity of stakeholders. Therefore, taking China’s A-share listed companies as an example, the research applied linear regressions with panel data, using the ESG rating of SynTao Green Finance Agency as a proxy variable of ESG performance. The results show that ESG performance significantly promotes the quantity and quality of corporate innovation and is mediated by alleviating the financial constraints and agency cost. Internal and external governance plays different roles; the higher institutional investors’ attention as an external governance form does not help enterprises improve the quantity and quality of corporate innovation; however, CEO duality as an internal governance form strengthens the effect of ESG performance on corporate innovation. This study provides scientific evidence for the effect and effect path of ESG performance on promoting proactive innovation based on sustainable development in China; furthermore, the study reveals the heterogeneity factors of ESG performance on the innovation effect under stakeholder theory.

Mutual fund activism and corporate innovation: Evidence from China

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Innovation: Evidence from Patent Filings and Citations in China

How Does Hedge Fund Activism Reshape Corporate Innovation?

Heterogeneous Institutional Investor,Nature of Firm and Independent Innovation

Promoting and inhibiting: Corporate charitable donations and innovation investment under different motivation orientations——Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Do mutual fund networks affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China

Stock Liquidity and Enterprise Innovation: New Evidence from China

The innovation incentive effect of green investors: evidence from fund holdings

Financial Institution Shareholding and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China

The impact of imperfect financial markets and stock holdings on corporate innovation: Evidence from China

Myopic Investor or Active Monitor? the Role of Institutional Investors in Corporate Innovation

Mutual Fund Activism and Market Regulation During the Pre-IFRS Period: the Case of Earnings Informativeness in China from an Ethical Perspective

Venture capital investment, intellectual property rights protection and firm innovation: evidence from China

The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost

Can fund shareholding inhibit insufficient R&D input?——Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

State capital involvement, managerial sentiment and firm innovation performance Evidence from China

An Empirical Study of the Influence of Mutual Funds on Firm Performance

Are Sustainable Firms More Innovative? The Case of China

Heterogeneous Shareholders’ Participation, COVID-19 Impact, and Innovation Decisions of State-Owned Firms: Evidence from China