Comparison of Computed Tomography and Clinical Features Between Patients Infected with the SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron Variant and the Original Strain
Yue Zhang,Qi Li,Jiang-Lin Xiang,Xing-Hua Li,Jing Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s448713
2024-03-05
Infection and Drug Resistance
Abstract:Yue Zhang, 1, &ast Qi Li, 1, &ast Jiang-Lin Xiang, 2 Xing-Hua Li, 1 Jing Li 3 1 Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Infectious Disease, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, 404000, People's Republic of China; 3 Medical Department, Liangjiang New Area Renhe Community Health Service Center, Chongqing, 401147, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Jing Li, Medical Department, Liangjiang New Area Renhe Community Health Service center, Chongqing, 401147, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 18716469389, Email Xing-Hua Li, Tel +86 18584603726, Email Purpose: To investigate potential differences in clinical and computed tomography (CT) features between patients with the SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron variant and the original strain. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 69 hospitalized patients infected with Omicron variant from November to December 2022, and 96 hospitalized patients infected with the original strain from February to March 2020 in Chongqing, China. The clinical features, CT manifestations, degrees of lung involvement in different stages on CT, and imaging changes after the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results turned negative were compared between the two groups. Results: For clinical features, patients with Omicron were predominantly old people and females, without manifestation of any clinical symptoms, who had low serum levels of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. Shorter interval from symptoms onset to initial CT scan was observed in Omicron patients compared to patients with the original strain (all P < 0.05). For CT features, patients with Omicron were more likely to present with round-like opacities and tree-in-bud pattern (all P < 0.05), but less likely to exhibit a diffuse distribution, patchy and linear opacities, as well as vascular enlargement pattern (all P < 0.05). The Omicron group was more susceptible to exhibiting lower CT involvement scores in each stage (all P < 0.05) and imaging progression after the RT-PCR results turned negative ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients infected with the Omicron variant exhibited less severe changes on chest CT compared to those infected with the original strain. Furthermore, imaging progression under low viral load conditions was more common in patients with Omicron than in those with the original strain. Keywords: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, pneumonia, computed tomography Since December 2019, many cases of unknown pneumonia have been reported in China, which were primarily caused by a novel coronavirus designated by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). SARS-CoV-2, which is the seventh family member in the β-coronaviruses, was found to induce dyspnea in more than half of the patients infected with the disease, subsequently progressing to the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome or even multiple-organ failure, leading to death. 1 The original strain mutations during viral replication and also many other variants had been previously reported during the pandemic worldwide. Among them, the Omicron variant has attracted significant attention due to its high transmissibility and prevalence in most countries by 2022. 2 A previous study demonstrated that patients infected with the Omicron variant had lower hospitalization rates and less severe symptoms than those infected with other strains. 3 The original SARS-CoV-2 and the Omicron variant were the two most prevalent strains in China, a fact which triggered researchers to observe certain significant differences between these two strains in clinical settings. A few studies have compared the clinical and imaging characteristics between Omicron and the original strains; 4,5 however, some differential features have not yet been comprehensively established. For example, an interesting phenomenon of imaging progression after the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results turned negative was frequently observed in patients with Omicron in clinical practice. Therefore, the present study aimed to further explore the differences in clinical and computed tomography (CT) characteristics between the Omicron and the original strains. We retrospectively collected data from 96 patients infected with the original strain, who were admitted to a large referral center -Abstract Truncated-
pharmacology & pharmacy,infectious diseases