Abstract:Low-frequency surface electromagnetic prospecting methods have been gaining a lot of interest because of their capabilities to directly detect hydrocarbon reservoirs and to compliment seismic measurements for geophysical exploration applications. There are two types of surface electromagnetic surveys. The first is an active measurement where we use an electric dipole source towed by a ship over an array of seafloor receivers. This measurement is called the controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) method. The second is the Magnetotelluric (MT) method driven by natural sources. This passive measurement also uses an array of seafloor receivers. Both surface electromagnetic methods measure electric and magnetic field vectors. In order to extract maximal information from these CSEM and MT data we employ a nonlinear inversion approach in their interpretation. We present two types of inversion approaches. The first approach is the so-called pixel-based inversion (PBI) algorithm. In this approach the investigation domain is subdivided into pixels, and by using an optimization process the conductivity distribution inside the domain is reconstructed. The optimization process uses the Gauss–Newton minimization scheme augmented with various forms of regularization. To automate the algorithm, the regularization term is incorporated using a multiplicative cost function. This PBI approach has demonstrated its ability to retrieve reasonably good conductivity images. However, the reconstructed boundaries and conductivity values of the imaged anomalies are usually not quantitatively resolved. Nevertheless, the PBI approach can provide useful information on the location, the shape and the conductivity of the hydrocarbon reservoir. The second method is the so-called model-based inversion (MBI) algorithm, which uses a priori information on the geometry to reduce the number of unknown parameters and to improve the quality of the reconstructed conductivity image. This MBI approach can also be used to refine the conductivity image obtained using the PBI approach. The MBI also adopts the multiplicative regularized Gauss–Newton method. The unknown parameters that govern the location and the shape of an anomaly are the locations of the user-defined nodes for the boundaries of the probed region, whereas the unknown parameter that describes the physical property is the conductivity. We will show some inversion results of synthetic and field data to demonstrate the advantages of both the PBI and MBI approaches. We further demonstrate that by combining both inversion algorithms we can arrive at a better interpretation of both CSEM and MT data.

Qualitative and quantitative reservoir characterisation using seismic inversion based on global optimization: A comparative case study

Qualitative and quantitative reservoir characterization using seismic inversion based on particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm: a comparative case study

Elastic Impedance Inversion Based on Improved Particle Swarm Optimization

Reservoir characterisation using hybrid optimisation of genetic algorithm and pattern search to estimate porosity and impedance volume from post-stack seismic data: A case study

Identification of the reservoir using seismic inversion based on particle swarm optimization method: A case study

Testing Different Stochastic Methods to Model Direct Current Resistivity and Seismic Refraction Geophysical Data Using a Combined Local and Global Optimization Algorithm

Geostatistical Rock Physics AVA Inversion

Global optimization with deep-learning-based acceleration surrogate for large-scale seismic acoustic-impedance inversion

Stability and uncertainty assessment of geoelectrical resistivity model parameters: a new hybrid metaheuristic algorithm and posterior probability density function approach

Gravity data inversion for parameters assessment over geologically faulted structures—A hybrid particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm technique

Comparison of neural networks techniques to predict subsurface parameters based on seismic inversion: a machine learning approach

Nature-inspired stochastic hybrid technique for joint and individual inversion of DC and MT data

Estimation of Petrophysical Properties Using Linear Programming Sparse Spike Inversion and Deep Feed-Forward Neural Network Techniques Over F3 Block, Netherlands: A Case Study

Particle swarm optimization and its application to seismic inversion of igneous rocks

Inversion of Reservoir Porosity, Saturation, and Permeability Based on a Robust Hybrid Genetic Algorithm

Ensemble of Neural Networks Utilizing Seismic Attributes for Rock‐Property Inversion With Uncertainty Estimation

Nonlinear inversion of electrical resistivity sounding data for multi-layered 1-D earth model using global particle swarm optimization (GPSO)

Inversion Algorithms for Large-Scale Geophysical Electromagnetic Measurements

Study on Global Optimization Methods for Wave Equation Inversion Problems

Joint Inversion of DC Resistivity and MT Data using Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimization

Reservoir parameter inversion of CO2 geological sequestration based on the self-adaptive hybrid genetic algorithm