Abstract:Current laboratory practices often involve students coming to lab having read a detailed protocol, performing the experiment, and leaving the lab rarely understanding the meaning behind the methods or the connection to research in general. They lack a conceptual understanding of the process and often do not understand how to manipulate data. Traditional methods do not provide students opportunities to think through the underlying scientific principles. Not only does this laboratory format not represent ‘real’ science, it leaves students unprepared for the often unpredictable and intimidating nature of experimental design. Research suggests that inquiry‐based pedagogical techniques can help promote student engagement and improve educational outcomes. Here, we present portions of a newly developed laboratory manual with which students will participate in the building of experimental protocols, implementing the experiments, and processing the data. Through this process, students will develop an understanding of scientific principles and data analysis, and think creatively in regards to experimental design. These practices have also been shown to increase student engagement in the laboratory. Current laboratory manuals, do not emphasize the building of these essential skills for anyone pursuing further education or a career in biochemistry, molecular biology, or related fields. We hope to bring these high impact learning practices to the biochemistry laboratory providing inquiry‐based experiments to better develop and engage our students in the biochemistry lab. In order to train the next generation of scientists, we must allow students to explore the scientific world in a safe, engaging, and meaningful way. It is our hope that the lab manual will be a pioneering advancement in the way educators approach undergraduate laboratories. This manual will be of great utility at both large institutions where access to a research environment is limited to a small population of the students and small institutions where resources are limited.

How Should Bioinformatics PIs Run Wet-Labs?

Ten simple rules for collaborating with wet lab researchers for computational researchers

Unmet needs for analyzing biological big data: A survey of 704 NSF principal investigators

Ten simple rules for computational biologists collaborating with wet lab researchers

Biologists need modern data infrastructure on campus

Bioinformatics in China: a personal perspective.

Spotlight on researchers during a wet-lab to dry-lab transition period: an interview with Guifen Liu and Qi Wang

Teaching the ABCs of Bioinformatics: a Brief Introduction to the Applied Bioinformatics Course

Biopipe: A Flexible Framework for Protocol-Based Bioinformatics Analysis

Fostering bioinformatics education through skill development of professors: Big Genomic Data Skills Training for Professors

The experimental teaching reform in biochemistry and molecular biology for undergraduate students in Peking University Health Science Center

Integrating Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Education

A course-based research experience: how benefits change with increased investment in instructional time

Adapting bioinformatics curricula for big data

Novel Computing Technologies for Bioinformatics and Cheminformatics

Development of an integrated and project-based laboratory course in upper-level biochemistry and molecular biology

A field guide to cultivating computational biology

Lab at home: a promising prospect for on-site chemical and biological analysis

The applications of Big Data in molecular diagnostics.

A Lab-in-a-droplet Bioassay Strategy for Centrifugal Microfluidics with Density Difference Pumping, Power to Disc and Bidirectional Flow Control.

A POGIL Based Laboratory Manual for Undergraduate Biochemistry