Abstract:Background Saccharomyces cerevisiae is widely studied for production of biofuels and biochemicals. To improve production efficiency under industrially relevant conditions, coordinated expression of multiple genes by manipulating promoter strengths is an efficient approach. It is known that gene expression is highly dependent on the practically used environmental conditions and is subject to dynamic changes. Therefore, investigating promoter activities of S. cerevisiae under different culture conditions in different time points, especially under stressful conditions is of great importance. Results In this study, the activities of various promoters in S. cerevisiae under stressful conditions and in the presence of xylose were characterized using yeast enhanced green fluorescent protein (yEGFP) as a reporter. The stresses include toxic levels of acetic acid and furfural, and high temperature, which are related to fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. In addition to investigating eight native promoters, the synthetic hybrid promoter P 3xC - TEF1 was also evaluated. The results revealed that P TDH3 and the synthetic promoter P 3xC - TEF1 showed the highest strengths under almost all the conditions. Importantly, these two promoters also exhibited high stabilities throughout the cultivation. However, the strengths of P ADH1 and P PGK1 , which are generally regarded as ‘constitutive’ promoters, decreased significantly under certain conditions, suggesting that cautions should be taken to use such constitutive promoters to drive gene expression under stressful conditions. Interestingly, P HSP12 and P HSP26 were able to response to both high temperature and acetic acid stress. Moreover, P HSP12 also led to moderate yEGFP expression when xylose was used as the sole carbon source, indicating that this promoter could be used for inducing proper gene expression for xylose utilization. Conclusion The results here revealed dynamic changes of promoter activities in S. cerevisiae throughout batch fermentation in the presence of inhibitors as well as using xylose. These results provide insights in selection of promoters to construct S. cerevisiae strains for efficient bioproduction under practical conditions. Our results also encouraged applications of synthetic promoters with high stability for yeast strain development.

Natural Promoters and Promoter Engineering Strategies for Metabolic Regulation Insaccharomyces Cerevisiae

Progress in Recombinant Construction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Improving Ethanol Production

Synthetic Promoter Design and Functional Evaluation in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

From natural to synthetic: Promoter engineering in yeast expression systems

Design and synthesis of synthetic promoters for consistency of gene expression across growth phases and scale in S. cerevisiae

Promoters inducible by aromatic amino acids and γ-aminobutyrate (GABA) for metabolic engineering applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Developing Synthetic Hybrid Promoters to Increase Constitutive or Diauxic Shift-Induced Expression in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Novel S. cerevisiae Hybrid Synthetic Promoters Based on Foreign Core Promoter Sequences

Hybrid promoter engineering strategies in Yarrowia lipolytica: isoamyl alcohol production as a test study

Advances in Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae for Terpenoids Biosynthesis

Condition-specific promoter activities in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The application of powerful promoters to enhance gene expression in industrial microorganisms

Cloning and characterization of a panel of constitutive promoters for applications in pathway engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

[Construction and preliminary applications of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae detection plasmid using for screening promoter elements]

Cloning and characterization of the promoters from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Construction, Characterization and Application of a Genome-Wide Promoter Library in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Controlling heterologous gene expression in yeast cell factories on different carbon substrates and across the diauxic shift: a comparison of yeast promoter activities

Engineering eukaryote-like regulatory circuits to expand artificial control mechanisms for metabolic engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Engineering of Synthetic, Stress-Responsive Yeast Promoters

Engineering artificial cross-species promoters with different transcriptional strengths

Promoter screening and identification for metabolic regulation in Acremonium chrysogenum