An Electro-Hydrogen Cogeneration System Combining Compressed Air Energy Storage and Methanol Cracking Reaction

Yufei Zhang,Huanran Wang,Ruixiong Li,Zhuangjie Wang,Lanning Ling,Peng Jin,Haiyang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.106351
IF: 9.4
2022-01-01
Journal of Energy Storage
Abstract:In order to solve the problems of insufficient utilization of compression heat in compressed air energy storage (CAES) system and the need for supplementary heat in methanol cracking reaction (MCR) for hydrogen production, an electro-hydrogen cogeneration system combining CAES and MCR was proposed in this study. The energy storage module of this system consists of two parts: adiabatic compression and near-isothermal compression. The heat generated by adiabatic compression is used to preheat methanol, and carbon monoxide generated by methanol cracking is used to supplement the heat of the cracker and the energy release module of the CAES system, respectively. The proposed system makes full use of low-grade compression heat while consuming the generated carbon monoxide to output hydrogen to the outside. By constructing a systematic thermodynamic model of the system, the effects of the key parameters on the system performance were investigated in depth. The results show that the energy efficiency and exergy efficiency of the system can reach 85.71 % and 80.94 %, respectively. When the suction pressure of the water-air coexisting tank is increased from 5 atm to 20 atm, the air storage mass increases by 33.96 %. At the cracking temperature of 708 K, the energy storage density can reach 12.37 kWh/m3, the hydrogen production mass is 3113.38 kg, and the relative energy saving rate is 54.38 %. The system performance can be improved by increasing the turbine inlet temperature of the first section and decreasing the turbine pressure ratio of the first section while keeping the total pressure ratio constant. The combustion chamber, cracking reactor and heat exchanger are the main factors that cause the exergy loss, accounting for 46.54 %, 30.16 % and 6.67 % of the total, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?