Abstract:Context: One of the critical phases in the software development life cycle is software testing. Testing helps with identifying potential bugs and reducing maintenance costs. The goal of automated test generation tools is to ease the development of tests by suggesting efficient bug-revealing tests. Recently, researchers have leveraged Large Language Models (LLMs) of code to generate unit tests. While the code coverage of generated tests was usually assessed, the literature has acknowledged that the coverage is weakly correlated with the efficiency of tests in bug detection. Objective: To improve over this limitation, in this paper, we introduce MuTAP (Mutation Test case generation using Augmented Prompt) for improving the effectiveness of test cases generated by LLMs in terms of revealing bugs by leveraging mutation testing. Methods: Our goal is achieved by augmenting prompts with surviving mutants, as those mutants highlight the limitations of test cases in detecting bugs. MuTAP is capable of generating effective test cases in the absence of natural language descriptions of the Program Under Test (PUTs). We employ different LLMs within MuTAP and evaluate their performance on different benchmarks. Results: Our results show that our proposed method is able to detect up to 28% more faulty human-written code snippets. Among these, 17% remained undetected by both the current state-of-the-art fully-automated test generation tool (i.e., Pynguin) and zero-shot/few-shot learning approaches on LLMs. Furthermore, MuTAP achieves a Mutation Score (MS) of 93.57% on synthetic buggy code, outperforming all other approaches in our evaluation. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that although LLMs can serve as a useful tool to generate test cases, they require specific post-processing steps to enhance the effectiveness of the generated test cases which may suffer from syntactic or functional errors and may be ineffective in detecting certain types of bugs and testing corner cases in PUTs.

Mutation Testing of Unsupervised Learning Systems

Mutation Testing of Reinforcement Learning Systems.

Towards Mutation Testing of Reinforcement Learning Systems

DeepMutation: Mutation Testing of Deep Learning Systems

What Are We Really Testing in Mutation Testing for Machine Learning? A Critical Reflection

MuNN: Mutation Analysis of Neural Networks

RGChaser: A RL-guided Fuzz and Mutation Testing Framework for Deep Learning Systems

Learning from Mutants: Using Code Mutation to Learn and Monitor Invariants of a Cyber-Physical System

Mutation Testing framework for Machine Learning

DeepMetis: Augmenting a Deep Learning Test Set to Increase its Mutation Score

Manifesting Bugs in Machine Learning Code: An Explorative Study with Mutation Testing

Effective test generation using pre-trained Large Language Models and mutation testing

Adversarial Sample Detection for Deep Neural Network through Model Mutation Testing

Improving Defect Detection Ability of Derived Test Cases Based on Mutated UML Activity Diagrams

Boundary Sampling to Boost Mutation Testing for Deep Learning Models.

An Approach to Test Data Generation for Killing Multiple Mutants

DevMuT: Testing Deep Learning Framework Via Developer Expertise-Based Mutation

Testing and Validating Machine Learning Classifiers by Metamorphic Testing.

METTLE: A Metamorphic Testing Approach To Validating Unsupervised Machine Learning Methods

A Probabilistic Framework for Mutation Testing in Deep Neural Networks