Breast Tangential Treatment Plan Using Flattening Filter-Free Beams: A Planning Study
J. Xie,J. Cao,W. Chen,Y. Cui,J. Galvin,Y. Yu,Y. Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.2319
2012-01-01
Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s)To evaluate the feasibility of using flattening filter free beams (FFF) for tangential supine whole breast radiation therapy and compare the dosimetric characteristics with treatment plans using flattening filter (FF) beams with wedges.Materials/MethodsSupine breast cancer plans of ten patients were analyzed for the feasibility planning study. The target volume was determined during the conventional simulation. Beam angles, wedge angles, and beam weightings were adjusted to optimize dose conformity of the target, while minimizing the exposure to ipsilateral lung, heart and contralateral breast. Two half-beam tangential treatment plans were created on treatment planning systems (TPS) for each patient: (1) tangential 6MV FFF open beams. (2) tangential wedged(dynamic) 6MV FF beams. The prescription dose was 50Gy/25 fractions for all plans. All treatment plans were normalized so that 95% of the prescribed dose covered the entire breast. This study compared plan features including target dose homogeneity, such as volume receiving greater than 105% of the prescription dose, low dose distribution to OAR and unspecified tissue, as well as average MU and beam-on time for plans with FFF and FF beams.ResultsTwo more sub-fields were added to each of three patients' plans utilizing FFF beams which had underdose region along superior and inferior directions to improve dose coverage. The wedge angles of FF plans ranged between 25° to 45°. For target dose homogeneity, the average reduction of V105% was on average 21.91% (standard deviation 7.43%) when FFF beams were used. Both FF and FFF tangential plans predicted similar low doses to ipsilateral lung and to the heart of left breast cancer patients. Compared with FF plans, The FFF plans predicted lower dose to unspecified tissue outside the field. The volume receiving > 100cGy reduced from 1041.52cc-1660.41cc for FFF beams plans compared with FF plans'. The average MU for FFF beams plans are 283.38 ±5.73%, with the beam-on time of about 12s;the corresponding values for FF beams plans are 261.63±2.00% and about 39s, respectively.ConclusionsFFF beams produce tangential plans of superior dosimetric quality for breast cancer treatment, with better target dose inhomogeneity and lower dose to unspecified tissue outside the target. With higher dose rate it is also possible to significantly reduce beam-on time, thus minimizing the effect of organ motion and increasing treatment efficiency. Purpose/Objective(s)To evaluate the feasibility of using flattening filter free beams (FFF) for tangential supine whole breast radiation therapy and compare the dosimetric characteristics with treatment plans using flattening filter (FF) beams with wedges. To evaluate the feasibility of using flattening filter free beams (FFF) for tangential supine whole breast radiation therapy and compare the dosimetric characteristics with treatment plans using flattening filter (FF) beams with wedges. Materials/MethodsSupine breast cancer plans of ten patients were analyzed for the feasibility planning study. The target volume was determined during the conventional simulation. Beam angles, wedge angles, and beam weightings were adjusted to optimize dose conformity of the target, while minimizing the exposure to ipsilateral lung, heart and contralateral breast. Two half-beam tangential treatment plans were created on treatment planning systems (TPS) for each patient: (1) tangential 6MV FFF open beams. (2) tangential wedged(dynamic) 6MV FF beams. The prescription dose was 50Gy/25 fractions for all plans. All treatment plans were normalized so that 95% of the prescribed dose covered the entire breast. This study compared plan features including target dose homogeneity, such as volume receiving greater than 105% of the prescription dose, low dose distribution to OAR and unspecified tissue, as well as average MU and beam-on time for plans with FFF and FF beams. Supine breast cancer plans of ten patients were analyzed for the feasibility planning study. The target volume was determined during the conventional simulation. Beam angles, wedge angles, and beam weightings were adjusted to optimize dose conformity of the target, while minimizing the exposure to ipsilateral lung, heart and contralateral breast. Two half-beam tangential treatment plans were created on treatment planning systems (TPS) for each patient: (1) tangential 6MV FFF open beams. (2) tangential wedged(dynamic) 6MV FF beams. The prescription dose was 50Gy/25 fractions for all plans. All treatment plans were normalized so that 95% of the prescribed dose covered the entire breast. This study compared plan features including target dose homogeneity, such as volume receiving greater than 105% of the prescription dose, low dose distribution to OAR and unspecified tissue, as well as average MU and beam-on time for plans with FFF and FF beams. ResultsTwo more sub-fields were added to each of three patients' plans utilizing FFF beams which had underdose region along superior and inferior directions to improve dose coverage. The wedge angles of FF plans ranged between 25° to 45°. For target dose homogeneity, the average reduction of V105% was on average 21.91% (standard deviation 7.43%) when FFF beams were used. Both FF and FFF tangential plans predicted similar low doses to ipsilateral lung and to the heart of left breast cancer patients. Compared with FF plans, The FFF plans predicted lower dose to unspecified tissue outside the field. The volume receiving > 100cGy reduced from 1041.52cc-1660.41cc for FFF beams plans compared with FF plans'. The average MU for FFF beams plans are 283.38 ±5.73%, with the beam-on time of about 12s;the corresponding values for FF beams plans are 261.63±2.00% and about 39s, respectively. Two more sub-fields were added to each of three patients' plans utilizing FFF beams which had underdose region along superior and inferior directions to improve dose coverage. The wedge angles of FF plans ranged between 25° to 45°. For target dose homogeneity, the average reduction of V105% was on average 21.91% (standard deviation 7.43%) when FFF beams were used. Both FF and FFF tangential plans predicted similar low doses to ipsilateral lung and to the heart of left breast cancer patients. Compared with FF plans, The FFF plans predicted lower dose to unspecified tissue outside the field. The volume receiving > 100cGy reduced from 1041.52cc-1660.41cc for FFF beams plans compared with FF plans'. The average MU for FFF beams plans are 283.38 ±5.73%, with the beam-on time of about 12s;the corresponding values for FF beams plans are 261.63±2.00% and about 39s, respectively. ConclusionsFFF beams produce tangential plans of superior dosimetric quality for breast cancer treatment, with better target dose inhomogeneity and lower dose to unspecified tissue outside the target. With higher dose rate it is also possible to significantly reduce beam-on time, thus minimizing the effect of organ motion and increasing treatment efficiency. FFF beams produce tangential plans of superior dosimetric quality for breast cancer treatment, with better target dose inhomogeneity and lower dose to unspecified tissue outside the target. With higher dose rate it is also possible to significantly reduce beam-on time, thus minimizing the effect of organ motion and increasing treatment efficiency.