A reasoned action approach: Some issues, questions, and clarifications

Martin Fishbein, I Ajzen, D Albarracin, R Hornik

2007-03-13

Abstract:The chapters in this volume have, each in their own way, raised some very important issues in relation to the reasoned action approach. Since the discussants have commented on each of the presentations, I will not try to do the same. Rather, I would like to address a number of issues that run through many of the chapters. It really is very rewarding to see that a reasoned action approach-represented by the Theories of Reasoned Action (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980), Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1985, 1991) and the Integrative Model (Fishbein, 2000)-continues to stimulate both proponents and critics to raise important questions about behavioral prediction and change. Indeed, although all the chapters in this volume are written by supporters of a reasoned action approach, several suggest additions or modifications to the theory. In this chapter I would like to address four of the themes that seem to run through a number of the chapters: the role of emotion; the prediction of complex and/or multiple behaviors; the role of perceived behavioral control as a moderator of intention's influence on behavior as well as of attitudinal and normative influences on intention; and finally, some concerns about the measurement of, and distinction between, attitudes, normative pressure, and perceived control.