Comparing Nanoparticle Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel and Solvent-Based Paclitaxel As First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: an Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial.
M. Shi,A. Gu,H. Tu,C. Huang,H. Wang,Z. Yu,X. Wang,L. Cao,Y. Shu,R. Yang,X. Li,J. Chang,Y. Hu,P. Shen,Z. Guo,M. Tao,Y. Zhang,X. Liu,Q. Sun,X. Zhang,Z. Jiang,J. Zhao,F. Chen,H. Yu,W. Zhang,J. Sun,D. Li,J. Zhou,B. Han,Y. L. Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.479
IF: 51.769
2020-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Background: Polymeric micellar paclitaxel (pm-Pac) is a novel Cremophor EL-free, nanoparticle micellar formulation of paclitaxel. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between pm-Pac plus cisplatin and solvent-based paclitaxel (sbPac) plus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: A total of 448 stage IIIB to IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive six 3-week cycles of either pm-Pac (230 mg/m(2) =) plus cisplatin (70 mg/m(2); n= 300), followed by dose escalation of pm-Pac to 300 mg/m(2) from the second 3-week cycle if prespecified toxic effects were not observed after the first cycle, or sb-Pac (175 mg/m(2)) plus cisplatin (70 mg/m(2); n= 148). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent review committees (IRCs). The secondary end points included IRC-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Patients in the pm-Pac-plus-cisplatin group showed significant improvements in IRC-assessed ORR compared with those in the sb-Pac-plus-cisplatin group (SO% versus 26%; rate ratio 1.91; P < 0.0001). Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that a higher ORR was consistently observed in both squamous and nonsquamous histological types. IRC-assessed median PFS was significantly higher in the pm-Pac-plus-cisplatin group than in the sb-Pac-pluscisplatin group (6.4-month versus 5.3-month; hazard ratio 0.63; P = 0.0001). Median OS was not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events (9% versus 18%; P 0.0090) was significantly lower in the pm-Pac-plus-cisplatin group than in the sb-Pac-plus-cisplatin group. Conclusion: Pm-Pac plus cisplatin yielded superior ORR and PFS along with a favorable safety profile and should become an option for patients with advanced NSCLC.