Evaluation of the value of PSG and blood oxygenation monitoring in patients with OSAHS

刘爽,李为,张婧,曾超
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20200329-01085
2022-01-01
International Journal of Nursing
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the value of polysomnography (PSG) and blood oxygenation monitoring in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).Methods:A total of 123 patients with OSAHS diagnosed in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were selected.According to the apnea and hypopnea index (AHI), patients with OSAHS were classified as mild (AHI was 5.0~ 14.9 times/h), moderate (AHI>15~29. 9 times/h), severe (AHI>30 times/h) 3 groups, while monitoring the PSG and blood oxygen bracelet for each patient, analysis of data after stimultaneous monitoring and recording.Results:The differences were statistically significant when comparing the time to sleep <90% (T90%), the proportion of time with oxygen saturation <90% of that time in rapid eye movement sleep (REMT90%), and the proportion of time with oxygen saturation <90% of that time in non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMT90%) in the three groups ( P<0.05); the parameters of T90%, REMT90% and NREMT90% were significantly lower in the mild group than in the moderate and severe groups, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05); T90%, REMT90% and NREMT90% parameters of patients in the moderate group were significantly lower than those in the severe group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05); the mean oxygen saturation (MSPO 2) and minimum oxygen saturation (LSPO 2) parameters were significantly higher in the mild group than in the moderate and the mean oxygen saturation (MSPO 2) and minimum oxygen saturation (LSPO 2) indexes of patients in the mild group were significantly higher than those in the moderate and severe groups, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05); MSPO 2 and LSPO 2 indicators were significantly higher in the moderate group than in the severe group; ODI indices were significantly lower in the moderate group than in the severe group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05), with the assessment of cardiac function in patients with acute coronary syndrome as the dependent variable and the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) content, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) content, and peptide content were used as independent variables. Statistical analysis was performed and found to be statistically significant (Chi-Square test, P<0.05), with the respective variables corresponding to variable effect sizes in the following order: NREMT 90% ( OR=3.857), ODI ( OR=3.065), REMT90% ( OR=2.829), T90% ( OR=24.84), LSPO 2 ( OR=2.363), MSPO 2 ( OR=1.878). Conclusions:PSG and blood oxygenation monitoring have a good evaluation value for patients with OSAHS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?